Consulting with an embedded librarian: student perceptions on the value of required research meetings

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1793

Keywords:

Embedded Librarian, Qualitative research, Consultations, Nursing Students, University library

Abstract

Objective: This qualitative research project was undertaken to discover how students perceive the embedded librarian in their nursing class. The researchers determined how a required group research meeting was valued by students and whether that value warranted the necessary time and energy by an embedded librarian.

Methods: Researchers conducted focus groups with twenty-three students from two different sections of the same nursing research methods undergraduate course. Students’ responses to a series of five questions were recorded within Zoom and supplemented by handwritten notes. Data was coded by hand and patterns that emerged from the five focus groups were analyzed.

Results: Participants reported overall satisfaction with the embedded librarian and students felt they benefitted from the required research meeting with the librarian, which was part of the searching assignment rubric and closely tied to the assignment itself.

Conclusion: Based on the data, a required research meeting with an embedded librarian, who is familiar with the course assignments, reinforces classroom instruction, point-of-need assistance with search strategies, and the opportunity to strengthen the relationship with the librarian for future research needs.

Author Biographies

Susan R. Franzen, Illinois State University

Associate Dean of Public Services and Organizational Development, Illinois State University, Normal, IL

Caitlin Stewart, Illinois State University

Teaching and Learning Librarian, Illinois State University, Normal, IL

Mallory Jallas, University of Illinois at Springfield

Head of Information Literacy and Academic Outreach, University of Illinois at Springfield, Springfield, IL

Joshua Newport, Illinois State University

Math and Science Librarian, Illinois State University, Normal, IL

References

Shumaker D. The embedded librarian: innovative strategies for taking knowledge where it’s needed. Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc.; 2012.

Dewey BI. The embedded librarian: strategic campus collaborations. Resourc Shar & Inf Netw. 2004;17(1/2):5-17.

Sharma P, Kumar K, Babbar P. Embedded librarianship: librarian faculty collaboration. Desidoc J Libr Inf Tech. 2014;34(6):455-460.

Konieczny A. Experiences as an embedded librarian in online courses. Med Ref Serv Q. 2010;29(1):47-57.

Zanin-Yost A. Academic collaborations: linking the role of the liaison/embedded librarian to teaching and learning. Coll Undergrad Libr. 2018;25(2):150-163.

Wu L, Betts VT, Jacob S, Nollan R, Norris T. Making meaningful connections: evaluating an embedded librarian pilot project to improve nursing scholarly writing. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013;101(4):323-6.

Blake L, Ballance D, Davies K, Gaines GK, Mears K, Shipman P, Connolly-Brown M, Burchfield V. Patron perception and utilization of an embedded librarian program. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(3):226-230.

Farrell A, Goosney J, Hutchens K. Evaluation of the effectiveness of course integrated library instruction in an undergraduate nursing program. J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2013 Dec 2013;164-175.

Wu L, Thornton J. Experience, challenges, and opportunities of being fully embedded in a user group. Med Ref Serv Q. 2017; 36(2):138-149.

Kamada H, Martin JR, Slack MK, Kramer SS. Understanding the information-seeking behavior of pharmacy college faculty, staff, and students: implications for improving embedded librarian services. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021;109(2):286-294.

Pleshkan V, Singarella I. Advancing nursing students’ transition to scholarship: embedding a librarian into the advanced nursing research course. J Med Libr Assoc. 2022;110(2): 228-232.

Franzen SR, Sharkey J. Impact of embedded librarianship on undergraduate nursing students’ information skills. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021;109(2):311-316. doi:10.5195/jmla.2021.913

Rogers E, Carrier HS. A qualitative investigation of patrons’ experiences with academic library research consultations. Ref Serv Rev. 2017;45(1):18-37.

Cole C, Reiter L. Online appointment-scheduling for optimizing a high volume of research consultations. Pa Libr Res Pract. 2017;5(2):138-143.

Kuglitsch RZ, Tingle N, Watkins A. Facilitating Research Consultations Using Cloud Services: Experiences, Preferences, and Best Practices. Inf Technol Libr. 2017;36(1):29-35.

Kani J. Evernote in the research consultation: a feasibility study. Ref Serv Rev. 2017;45(1):67-78.

Watts J, Mahfood S. Collaborating with faculty to assess research consultations for graduate students. Behav Soc Sci Librar. 2015;34(2):70-87.

Zanin-Yost A, Dillen C. Connecting past to future needs: nursing faculty and librarian collaboration to support students’ academic success. J Libr Adm. 2019;59(1):45-58.

Clifton S, Jo P. A journey worth taking: exploring a hybrid embedded library instruction model through three distinct cases. Med Ref Serv Q. 2016;35(3):305-318.

Yi H. Individual research consultation service: an important part of an information literacy program. Ref Serv Rev. 2003;31(4):342-350.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-10-07

Issue

Section

Original Investigation