Designing a framework for curriculum building in systematic review competencies for librarians: a case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1930Keywords:
teaching, curriculum, systematic reviews, expert searchingAbstract
Background: Librarians play an important role on systematic review teams because of their expertise in information organization, database searching, and records management. Many systematic review training opportunities exist, but not all are tailored to the needs of librarians. The Medical Library Association, along with a workgroup of experts on systematic reviews and review services, developed a Systematic Review Services Specialization (SRSS) that was launched in 2022. One of the required courses in the specialization was developed by the authors, who set out to build a value-added curriculum that would provide essential searching skills for librarians working in evidence synthesis domains.
Case Presentation: The authors present a case report on creating a framework for developing a new course in the Medical Library Association's Systematic Review Services Specialization. The objectives of the course were intended to align with six systematic review competencies for librarians developed and published by a group of health science librarians from the University of Michigan in 2017, which include 1) conducting a reference interview, 2) performing preliminary searches, 3) selecting appropriate resources to search, 4) building an extensive, comprehensive, and documented search strategy, 5) peer reviewing search strategies, and 6) reporting search methods. With these objectives in mind, the instructors created four separate modules and an activity.
Conclusion: Systematic review skills for librarians are essential to many health science library jobs since librarians are considered important collaborators within systematic review teams. Through eleven cohorts of the course held over 2022-2024, the authors constructed and delivered a comprehensive curriculum.
References
Koffel JB. Use of recommended search strategies in systematic reviews and the impact of librarian involvement: a cross-sectional survey of recent authors. PloS one. 2015;10(5):e0125931.
Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. Jun 2015;68(6):617-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
Metzendorf M-I. Why medical information specialists should routinely form part of teams producing high quality systematic reviews–a Cochrane perspective. Journal of the European Association for Health Information and Libraries. 2016;12(4):6-9.
Pawliuk C, Cheng S, Zheng A, Hal Siden H. Librarian involvement in systematic reviews was associated with higher quality of reported search methods: a cross-sectional survey of authors from Vancouver, BC. J Clin Epidemiol. Dec 8 2023:111237. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111237
Schellinger J, Sewell K, Bloss JE, Ebron T, Forbes C. The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0256833. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256833
Spencer AJ, Eldredge JD. Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review. J Med Libr Assoc. Jan 2018;106(1):46-56. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2018.82
Foster MJ. Overview of the role of librarians in systematic reviews: From expert search to project manager. Joural of European Association of Health Information Librarians. 2015;11(2): 3-7. https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/169677
Scott MC, Vogus B. Academic librarians and systematic reviews: trends and services. Public Services Quarterly. 2022;18(3):202-208.
Meert D, Torabi N, Costella J. Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2016;104(4):267.
Cochrane Collaboration. Higgins J TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Tianjing L, Page M, Welch V, ed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 6.4. 2023. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current
JBI. Aromataris E MZ, ed. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL
Institute of Medicine. Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. National Academies Press; 2011.
Campbell Collaboration. Campbell Collaboration. https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/
Lefebvre C GJ, Briscoe S, Feathersone R, Littlewood A, Metzendorf MI, Noel-Storr A, Paynter R, Rader T, Thomas J, Wieland LS, Cochrane Information Retrieval Methods Group. Chapter 4: Searching for and Selecting Studies. In: Higgins JPT TJ, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA, ed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 64 (updated August 2023). 2023. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current/chapter-04
Kugley S, Wade A, Thomas J, et al. Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2016;10
Townsend WA, Anderson PF, Ginier EC, MacEachern MP, Saylor KM, Shipman BL, Smith JE. A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):268-275. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2017.189. Epub 2017 Jul 1. PMID: 28670216; PMCID: PMC5490706.
Miller GE. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance. Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199009000-00045. PMID: 2400509.
Medical Library Association. Systematic Review Services Specialization. https://www.mlanet.org/page/systematic-review-services-specialization
MEDLIB-ED. Systematic Review Services Specialization. https://www.mlanet.org/professional-development/medlib-ed/specilization-systematic-review-services-specialization-srss/.
McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement. J Clin Epidemiol. Jul 2016;75:40-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.01.021.
Lefebvre C, McGowan, G., Salzwedel, D., Sampson, M. PRESSforum: The Peer Review Portal for Librarians. https://pressforum.pbworks.com/
Canada's Drug and Health Technology Agency. PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. https://www.cadth.ca/press-peer-review-electronic-search-strategies
Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews(). J Med Libr Assoc. Apr 1 2021;109(2):174-200. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.962
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. Mar 29 2021;372:n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 David Farris, Rachael Lebo, Carrie Price
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
