Reimagining information literacy instruction in an evidence-based practice nursing course for undergraduate students

Bethany Sheriese McGowan


This case report describes the redesign process for an undergraduate evidence-based practice (EBP) nursing course in which the librarian serves as both co-instructor and co-instructional designer. As part of the undergraduate outcomes-based core curriculum, this required course teaches the principles of the research process; teaches students to identify the strengths and limitations of research articles in relation to EBP; and builds student confidence in their abilities to execute information literacy, data management, and scholarly communication competencies. The course redesign built on an existing student-centered course design, with the specific goal of transitioning the course from a senior-level course to a sophomore-level course, while achieving the same learning objectives. This goal was accomplished by integrating a combination of distributed practice and interleaved practice learning experiences into the course curriculum.


Student-Centered Learning; Active Learning; Instructional Design; Embedded Librarianship

Full Text:



Mcmurtie B. How Purdue professors are building more active and engaged classrooms. Chron Higher Educ. 2018 Oct. (Available from: . [cited 25 Jul 2019].)

FitzSimmons J. IMPACT data dashboard [Internet]. IMPACT; 25 Sep 2018 [cited 25 Jul 2019]. .

Maybee C, Tomalee D, Riehle CF. Making an IMPACT: campus-wide collaboration for course learning and space transformation. Coll Res Libr News. 2013 Jan;74(1):32–5.

Maybee C, Carlson J, Slebodnik M, Chapman B. It’s in the syllabus: identifying information literacy and data information literacy opportunities using a grounded theory approach. J Acad Librariansh. 2015 Jul;41(4):369–76.

Boyer EL, Moser D, Ream TC, Braxton JM. Scholarship reconsidered: priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; John Wiley & Sons; 2015.

Huber MT. The scholarship of teaching and learning in and across the disciplines. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 2013.

McKinney K. Enhancing learning through the scholarship of teaching and learning: the challenges and joys of juggling. John Wiley & Sons; 2010.

Melton BF, Bland HW, Chopak-Foss J. Achievement and satisfaction in blended learning versus traditional general health course designs. Int J Scholarsh Teach Learn. 2009;3(1):26.

Smith RA. Moving toward the scholarship of teaching and learning: the classroom can be a lab, too! Teach Psychology. 2008 Oct;35(4):262–6.

Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne. 2008 Aug;49(3):182–5.

Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, Nathan MJ, Willingham DT. Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013 Jan;14(1):4–58.

Bell SJ, Shank, JD. Academic librarianship by design: a blended librarian’s guide to the tools and techniques. American Library Association; 2007.

McGowan B. Searching as strategic exploration building block activity [Internet]. Libr Faculty Staff Creative Materials; Dec 2018 [cited 25 Jul 2018], .

Adams NE. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Jul;103(3):152–3. DOI:

Brassey J, Mahtani K, Spencer EA, Heneghan C. Catalogue of bias collaboration: volunteer bias. Catalogue Bias. 2017. .

McNally B, Chipperfield J, Dorsett P, Del Fabbro L, Frommolt V, Goetz S, Lewohl J, Molineux M, Pearson A, Reddan G, Roiko A, Rung A. Flipped classroom experiences: student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context. Higher Educ. 2017 Feb;73(2):281–98.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Bethany Sheriese McGowan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.