Implementing an interprofessional information literacy course: impact on student abilities and attitudes

Authors

  • Marcia E. Rapchak Gumberg Library, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-6283
  • David A. Nolfi Gumberg Library, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Melanie T. Turk School of Nursing, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Lori Marra Rangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Christine K. O'Neil School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.455

Keywords:

Interprofessional Education, Information Literacy, Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale

Abstract

Objectives: The authors investigated the impact of an interprofessional, freshman-level, information literacy course on nursing, pharmacy, and allied health professions students by examining whether students successfully met learning objectives in the course related to interprofessional attitudes, identification of research study types, and ability to relate evidence-based practice questions to their disciplines.

Methods: Student posters (n=20) completed in a team project were evaluated to determine whether students were able to accurately identify the type of evidence, population, intervention, and primary outcome of studies (n=192). Additionally, posters (n=78) were evaluated to assess whether students could identify a relevant foreground question and link it to their disciplines. Students also completed the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) before (n=413) and after (n=352) the course to determine whether their attitudes toward interprofessional learning changed.

Results: Students performed well on learning outcomes in the course, with most teams identifying relevant evidence-based practice questions (83.8%) and effectively connecting questions with their disciplines (65.4%). Students correctly identified the type of evidence, population, intervention, and primary outcome for 70.0%, 81.8%, 76.0%, and 74.0% of cited studies, respectively. Student attitudes after the course did not significantly change.

Conclusion: Interprofessional information literacy education can generate positive learning experiences for freshman health care professions students to increase their beginning-level understanding of research in the health care professions and to prepare them for participation in future interprofessional courses and health care teams.

 This article has been approved for the Medical Library Association’s Independent Reading Program.

References

D’Amour D, Oandasan I. Interprofessionality as the field of interprofessional practice and interprofessional education: an emerging concept. J Interprof Care. 2005 May;19(suppl 1):8–20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820500081604.

Coster S, Norman A, Murrells S, Kitchen SC, Meerabeau E, Sooboodoo E, d’Avray L. Interprofessional attitudes amongst undergraduate students in the health professions: a longitudinal questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Nov;45(11):1667–81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.008.

World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education & collaborative practice [WHO/HRH/HPN/10.3] [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: The Organization; 2010 [cited 2 Aug 2018]. <http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/framework_action/en/>.

Rapchak ME, Nolfi DA, Turk MT; Marra L, O’Neil CK. 18 May 2015.

Dearholt SL, Dang D. Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: models and guidelines. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau; 2012.

Visser CLF, Ket JCF, Croiset G, Kusurkar RA. Perceptions of residents, medical and nursing students about interprofessional education: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative literature. BMC Med Educ. 2017 May;17(1):77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0909-0.

Interprofessional Education Collaborative. Core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: 2016 update [Internet]. Washington, DC: Interprofessional Education Collaborative; 2016 [cited 2 Aug 2018]. <https://nebula.wsimg.com/2f68a39520b03336b41038c370497473?AccessKeyId=DC06780E69ED19E2B3A5&disposition=0&alloworigin=1>.

Parsell G, Bligh J. The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS). Med Educ. 1999 Feb;33(2):95–100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00298.x.

Latrobe Community Health Service & the Health & Socialcare Interprofessional Network (HSIN). Readiness for interprofessional learning scale (RIPLS) [Internet]. Victoria, Australia: The Network; 2009 [cited 2 Aug 2108]. [Adapted from Parsell and Bligh’s RIPLS survey]. <https://nexusipe.org/informing/resource-center/ripls-readiness-interprofessional-learning-scale>.

McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031.

Aronoff N, Stellrecht E, Lyons AG, Zafron ML, Glogowski M, Grabowski J, Ohtak PJ. Teaching evidence-based practice principles to prepare health professions students for an interprofessional learning experience. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):376–84. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.179.

Stull CL, Blue CM. Examining the influence of professional identity formation on the attitudes of students towards interprofessional collaboration. J Interprof Care. 2016;30(1):90–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2015.1066318.

Pollard KC, Miers ME, Gilchrist M, Sayers A. A comparison of interprofessional perceptions and working relationships among health and social care students: the results of a 3-year intervention. Health Soc Care Community. 2006 Nov;14(6):541–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00642.x.

Tunstall-Pedoe S, Rink E, Hilton S. Student attitudes to undergraduate interprofessional education. J Interprof Care. 2003 May;17(2):161–72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1356182031000081768.

Riskiyana R, Claramita M, Rahayu GR. Objectively measured interprofessional education outcome and factors that enhance program effectiveness: a systematic review. Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Jul;66:73–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.04.014.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-04

Issue

Section

Original Investigation