Prevalence and impact of remote and hybrid work in academic health sciences libraries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1905Keywords:
remote work, hybrid work, recruitment, retention, job satisfactionAbstract
Objective: This study assesses the prevalence, usage, and impact of remote/hybrid work in academic health science libraries in 2022 and 2023. Due to differences in survey distribution, we focus primarily on the results of the second survey.
Methods: Researchers surveyed administrators at Association of Academic Health Sciences Libraries (AAHSL) member libraries in the United States in March 2022 and library staff at academic health sciences libraries in March 2023.
Results: The first survey received 71 responses that met inclusion criteria. Ninety-five percent of respondents indicated that remote/hybrid work was allowed in their libraries. Majorities indicated that remote/hybrid work had a positive impact on morale (86%), recruitment (53%) and retention (67%). The second survey received 383 responses that met inclusion criteria. 78% of respondents indicated they were allowed to work remotely, and majorities indicated remote/hybrid work positively impacted work/life balance (75%), morale/job satisfaction (69%), likelihood of staying at their current institution (64%), and productivity/overall effectiveness (58%). Respondents were less likely to accept a fully onsite (45% unlikely) or fully remote (20% unlikely) position than a hybrid one (1% unlikely). In a list of 9 factors associated with recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction, only salary and benefits ranked higher than remote/hybrid work.
Conclusions: Remote/hybrid work is common in academic health science libraries and highly valued by employees. While not without challenges, remote/hybrid work appears to be a valuable tool to support recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction of workers in academic health sciences libraries. The findings of this study can inform library decision makers about future use of remote/hybrid work.
References
McKinsey & Company. Americans are embracing flexible work--and they want more of it. [Internet]. McKinsey & Company. 2022 Jun 23 [cited 27 Oct 2023]. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/real-estate/our-insights/americans-are-embracing-flexible-work-and-they-want-more-of-it.
Jones JM. Remote work stable at higher rate post-pandemic. [Internet]. Gallup.com. 2023 Sep 9 [cited 19 Dec 2023]. https://news.gallup.com/poll/510785/remote-work-stable-higher-rate-post-pandemic.aspx.
Rodarte A, Moore A. Academic librarians’ perceptions of productivity while working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Librarianship. 2022 Dec;7(2):5–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2022.vol7.2.230.
At-home work uncommon in libraries. Library Personnel News. 1990 Jan 15;4:2.
Zabel D, Friend L, Meringolo SM. Flexible work arrangements in ARL libraries. Washington, DC: ARL Office of Mgt. Services; 1992. (SPEC Kit #180).
Luce RE, Hartman S. Telecommuting to work: using technology to work at home. Library Hi Tech. 1984 Jan 1;2(4):79–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb047576.
Farwell DC, Farwell BM. Telecommuting. In: Encyclopedia of Library & Information Science, 43, Suppl. 8. 1988 Jan;202-13.
Dalton PI. Telecommuting helps ADA implementation. Library Personnel News. 1995 Dec 11;9:3–4.
Nguyen, H, McShane, K, Willmering, B, Hamilton F. Rethinking the workforce and workplace: alternative ways of getting the job done. Serials Librarian. 1994 Sep;26(1):255–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v25n03_27.
Schneider KG. Managing the virtual workplace. Library Journal. 2003 Jan 2;128(20):24–5.
Guy M. Get tooled up: staying connected: technologies supporting remote workers. Ariadne [Internet]. 2008 Oct 30 [cited 16 Jun 2023];(57). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/57/guy/.
Guy M. A support framework for remote workers. Ariadne [Internet]. 2009 Apr 30 [cited 16 Jun 2023];(59). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/59/guy/.
Duncan J. Working from afar: A new trend for librarianship. Coll. Res. Libraries News. 2008 Apr;69(4):216–36.
Thomson L. “When I’ve packed it in and they send me something?”: information boundaries in professional home offices. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2013 Jan;50(1):1–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14505001158.
Hickey D, Tang N. Theoretical and applied approaches to remote work for academic reference and instruction librarians. In: Schmehl Hines, S., Simons, M., editors. Library staffing for the future. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2015. p. 177–200. (Advances in Library Administration and Organization; vol. 34). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0732-067120150000034008.
Ragon B, Whipple EC, Rethlefsen ML. Except for my commute, everything is the same: the shared lived experience of health sciences libraries during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2022 Oct;110(4):419–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1475.
Miller K, Janke R. Canadian academic nursing librarians: impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on librarianship practice. J. Can. Health Libr. Assoc. 2022 Aug;43(2):47–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29596.
Petersen D. Remote and hybrid work options for health science librarians: a survey of job postings before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Med. Ref. Serv. Q. 2023 Apr;42(2):153–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2023.2194144.
Green A. Academic library employees and their work modality options and preferences. J. Acad. Libr. 2023 Sep;49(5):102764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102764.
Singh K, Bossaller JS. It’s just not the same: virtual teamwork in public libraries. J. Libr. Adm. 2022 Jun 5;62(4):512–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2057130.
Hosoi M. Reshaping perspectives on flexible work: the impact of COVID-19 on academic library management. portal: Libr. Acad. 2021 Oct;21(4):1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2021.0038.
Zaki A. 67% of Hybrid Workers Would Take a Pay Cut to Keep Work Environment. CFO [Internet]. 2023 Feb 22 [cited 19 Dec 2023]. <https://www.cfo.com/news/67-of-hybrid-workers-would-take-a-pay-cut-to-keep-work-environment/654664/>.
Pionke JJ. Medical library association diversity and inclusion task force 2019 survey report. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jul;108(3):503-512. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2020.948
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. Household data annual averages. Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity. 2023 [cited 30 May 2024]. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 David Petersen, Matthew Covey, Janet Crum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
