A health education outreach partnership between an academic medical library and public library: lessons learned before and during a pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1413Keywords:
outreach, community engagement, health education, health literacy, public library, academic medical libraryAbstract
Background: Public libraries serve as community centers for accessing free, trustworthy health information. As such, they provide an ideal setting to teach the local community about health and health literacy, particularly during public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic. Since 2018, an outreach partnership between an academic medical library and public library has developed, delivered, and continuously evaluated a health education program targeting public library users.
Case Presentation: Health education activities were integrated into three existing public library programs: adult workshops, child and family programming, and circulating family activity kits. Prior to COVID-19, events were held at the public library, which then pivoted online during the pandemic. An interprofessional team approach combined the expertise of academic medical and public librarians, medical school faculty and staff, and medical students in developing the educational programs. Twelve in-person and five virtual programs were offered, and five circulating health education family kits were launched. Activities were assessed using program evaluation surveys of the adult and children’s programs and circulation statistics of the kits.
Conclusions: This case report showcases the lessons learned from implementing a longitudinal outreach partnership between an academic medical library and public library before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The interprofessional team approach and flexibility in program design and delivery in both the in-person and virtual environments proved critical to the success of the partnership. This partnership could serve as a model for other libraries interested in pursuing interprofessional collaborations in educating local communities on healthy behavior and health information–seeking practices.
References
of U.S. academic libraries, highlighting a Midwestern university’s experience. Health Info Libr J. 2013;30(2):121–137. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12017.
Naeem S Bin, Bhatti R. The COVID-19 “infodemic”: a new front for information professionals. Heal Inf Libr J. 2020 Sep;37(3):233–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12311.
Badell-Grau RA, Cuff JP, Kelly BP, Waller-Evans H, Lloyd-Evans E. Investigating the prevalence of reactive online searching in the COVID-19 pandemic: infoveillance study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 1;22(10). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19791.
Ali SH, Foreman J, Tozan Y, Capasso A, Jones AM, DiClemente RJ. Trends and predictors of COVID-19 information sources and their relationship with knowledge and beliefs related to the pandemic: nationwide cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Heal Surveill. 2020 Oct 1;6(4). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/21071.
Yi YJ. Consumer health information behavior in public libraries: a qualitative study. Libr Q. 2015 Jan;85(1):45–63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/679025.
Harris R, Henwood F, Marshall A, Burdett S. “I’m not sure if that’s what their job is”: consumer health information and emerging “healthwork” roles in the public library. Ref User Serv Q. 2010;49(3):239–52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.49n3.239.
Kelly K. Lack of training and a self-service environment leaves staff and users uncertain about health information in a public library setting. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract. 2012 Apr;7(1):122–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/b8z89m.
Goddard J. Public libraries respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, creating a new service model. Inf Technol Libr. 2020 Dec;39(4):1–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v39i4.12847.
Matthews JR. COVID-19 and public libraries: a real paradigm shift. Public Libr Q. 2020 Sep;39(5):389–90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2020.1796431.
Smith J. Information in crisis: analysing the future roles of public libraries during and post-COVID-19. J Aust Libr Inf Assoc. 2020;69:422–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/24750158.2020.1840719.
Flaherty MG. From Google to MedlinePlus: the wide range of authoritative health information provision in public libraries. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2016 Apr;38(2):101–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.001.
Rubenstein EL. “I want to provide patrons with good information”: public library staff as health information facilitators. Libr Q. 2018;88(2):125–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/696579.
Rubenstein EL. Health information and health literacy: public library practices, challenges, and opportunities. Public Libr Q. 2016 Jan;35(1):49–71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2016.1163974.
DeRosa AP, Jedlicka C, Mages KC, Stribling JC. Crossing the Brooklyn Bridge: a health literacy training partnership before and during COVID-19. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jan;109(1):90–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.1014.
Koos JA, Saragossi J, Stevens GA, Filosa S. A partnership between academic and public librarians: “What the Health” workshop series. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):232–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.564.
Luo L. Health information programming in public libraries: a content analysis. Public Libr Q. 2018 Jul;37(3):233–47. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2018.1498704.
Murray S. Consumer health information services in public libraries in Canada and the US. J Can Heal Libr Assoc. 2008;29(4):141–3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5596/c08-037.
Eastwood EJ, Goldman B. Help Your Health! Establishing a consumer health program in a small public library. J Hosp Librariansh. 2007 Mar;7(2):57–65. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j186v07n02_05.
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine. Mission, vision, and goals [Internet]. 2021 [cited 21 Jul 2021]. <http://www.oakland.edu/medicine/about>.
Swanberg SM, Mi M, Engwall K, Bulgarelli N. Community engagement at an emerging academic medical library: a three-pronged outreach model. Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Jul 3;37(3):234–48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2018.1477707
Oakland University. Strategic plan [Internet]. 2021 [cited 21 Jul 2021]. <https://oakland.edu/president/initiatives/strategic-plan>.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. City of Auburn Hills community profile [Internet]. 2019 [cited 21 Jul 2021]. <https://semcog.org/Community-Profiles/Communities=2220>.
US Census. American community survey: 5-year estimates data profiles - Auburn Hills [Internet]. 2019. [cited 19 Oct 2021]. <https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?tid=ACSDP5Y2019.DP03&g=0400000US26_1600000US2604105>.
National Institutes of Health. NIH’s All of Us Research Program partners with the National Library of Medicine to reach communities through local libraries [Internet]. 2017. [cited 22 Nov 2021]. <https://allofus.nih.gov/news-events-and-media/announcements/nihs-all-us-research-program-partners-national-library-medicine>.
Bulgarelli N, Look E, Swanberg SM, Yuen EW, Jayakumar M, Shubitowski T, Wedemeyer R, Lucia V. Datasets for submitted article titled "A Health Education Partnership Between an Academic Medical Library and Public Library: Lessons Learned Before & During a Pandemic" [dataset]. OUR@Oakland [2021; cited 22 Nov 2021]. <http://hdl.handle.net/10323/11355>.
Massey S. Using emojis and drawings in surveys to measure children’s attitudes to mathematics. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 17;1–13. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1940774.
Fane J, MacDougall C, Jovanovic J, Redmond G, Gibbs L. Exploring the use of emoji as a visual research method for eliciting young children’s voices in childhood research. Early Child Dev Care. 2018 Mar 4;188(3):359–74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1219730.
Institute for Healthcare Advancement. Using the Teach-back Toolkit [Internet]. The Institute; 2021 [cited 21 Jul 2021]. <http://www.teachbacktraining.org/using-the-teach-back-toolkit>.
Whitney W, Dutcher GA, Keselman A. Evaluation of health information outreach: theory, practice, and future direction. J Med Lib Assoc. 2013 Apr;101(2):138–46. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.2.009
Banks RA, Thiss RH, Rios GR, Self PC. Outreach services: issues and challenges. Med Ref Serv Q. 1997;16(2):1–10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j115v16n02_01.
Jones S. Optimizing public library resources in a post COVID-19 world. J Libr Adm. 2020;60(8):951–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1820281.
Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, Chen-Li D, Iacobucci M, Ho R, Majeed A, McIntyre RS. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55–64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001
Perrin A, Atske S. 7% of Americans don’t use the internet. Who are they? [Internet]. Pew Research Center; 2021 [cited 6 Dec 2021]. <https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/04/02/7-of-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/>.
Kniffin KM. COVID-19 and the workplace: implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. Am Psychol. 2020 Jan 1;76(1):63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Stephanie M. Swanberg, Nancy Bulgarelli, Mithya Jayakumar, Erin Look, Tyler B. Shubitowski, Rose Wedemeyer, Emily W. Yuen, Victoria C. Lucia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
