The publication fate of abstracts presented at the Medical Library Association conferences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.1220Keywords:
publishing, congresses as topic, libraries, medical, health sciences librariansAbstract
Objective: We sought to determine how many abstracts presented at the 2012 and 2014 Medical Library Association (MLA) annual conferences were later published as full-text journal articles and which features of the abstract and first author influence the likelihood of future publication. To do so, we replicated a previous study on MLA conference abstracts presented in 2002 and 2003. The secondary objective was to compare the publication rates between the prior and current study.
Methods: Presentations and posters delivered at the 2012 and 2014 MLA meetings were coded to identify factors associated with publication. Postconference publication of abstracts as journal articles was determined using a literature search and survey sent to first authors. Chi-squared tests were used to assess differences in the publication rate, and logistic regression was used to assess the influence of abstract factors on publication.
Results: The combined publication rate for the 2012 and 2014 meetings was 21.8% (137/628 abstracts), which is a statistically significant decrease compared to the previously reported rate for 2002 and 2003 (27.6%, 122/442 abstracts). The odds that an abstract would later be published as a journal article increased if the abstract was multi-institutional or if it was research, specifically surveys or mixed methods research.
Conclusions: The lower publication rate of MLA conference abstracts may be due to an increased number of program or nonresearch abstracts that were accepted or a more competitive peer review process for journals. MLA could increase the publication rate by encouraging and enabling multi-institutional research projects among its members.
References
Vega RD, Connell RS. Librarians’ attitudes toward conferences: a study. Coll Res Libr. 2007;68(6):503–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.6.503.
Neves J, Lavis JN, Ranson MK. A scoping review about conference objectives and evaluative practices: how do we get more out of them? Health Res Policy Sys. 2012;10(1):26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-10-26.
González‐Santos S, Dimond R. Medical and scientific conferences as sites of sociological interest: a review of the field. Sociol Compass. 2015;9(3):235–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12250.
Lang R, Porter K, Krentz HB, Gill MJ. Evaluating medical conferences: the emerging need for a quality metric. Scientometrics. 2020;122(1):759–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03291-w.
Scherer RW, Meerpohl JJ, Pfeifer N, Schmucker C, Schwarzer G, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(11). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4.
Fennewald J. Perished or published: the fate of presentations from the ninth ACRL conference. Coll Res Libr. 2005;66(6):517–26. Available from: http://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/15760.
Aleixandre-Benavent R, González-Alcaide G, Miguel-Dasit A, Navarro-Molina C, Valderrama-Zurián J. Full-text publications in peer-reviewed journals derived from presentations at three ISSI conferences. Scientometrics. 2009;80(2):407–18. Available from: https://akjournals.com/view/journals/11192/80/2/article-p407.xml.
Harvey SA, Wandersee JR. Publication rate of abstracts of papers and posters presented at Medical Library Association annual meetings. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jul;98(3):250–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.014.
Shaw CE, Szwajcer AL. Publication rate of presentation abstracts presented at the Canadian Health Libraries Association (CHLA/ABSC) annual meetings from 2004-2009. Performance Measurement Metric. 2016;17(3):252–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-07-2016-0034.
Alpi KM, Fenske R. Previous research shows Medical Library Association award winner publication rate. J Med Libr Assoc. 2012;99(1):3. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3163%2F1536-5050.99.1.002.
Lessick S, Perryman C, Billman BL, Alpi KM, De Groote SL, Babin TD. Research engagement of health sciences librarians: a survey of research-related activities and attitudes. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(2):166–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.68.
MLA: Meetings : Past and future meetings [Internet]. Medical Library Association. [cited 2020 Nov 16]. Available from: https://www.mlanet.org/p/cm/ld/fid=56.
Peritz BC. The methods of library science research: some results from a bibliometric survey. Library Research. 1980;2(3):251–68.
Gore SA, Nordberg JM, Palmer LA, Piorun ME. Trends in health sciences library and information science research: an analysis of research publications in the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association and Journal of the Medical Library Association from 1991 to 2007. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009;97(3):203–11. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2706445/.
Myers B. What we talk about when we talk about medical librarianship: an analysis of Medical Library Association annual meeting abstracts, 2001–2019. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;108(3):364–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.836.
Neville TM, Henry DB. Support for research and service in Florida academic libraries. J Acad Librariansh. 2007;33(1):76–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2006.06.003.
Hoffmann K, Berg S, Koufogiannakis D. Understanding factors that encourage research productivity for academic librarians. EBLIP. 2017;12(4):102–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18438/B8G66F.
Drott MC. Reexamining the role of conference papers in scholarly communication. J Am Soc Inform Sci Tech. 1995;46:299–305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199505)46:4<299::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-0.
Light A, Dadabhoy M, Burrows A, Nandakumar M, Gupta T, Karthikeyan S, Daniel A. Publication fate of abstracts presented at four British surgical meetings: an 11-year follow-up. J Surg Res. 2019;234:139–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.047.
Spencer S, Majkowski C, Suda KJ. Predictors of publication rates for abstracts presented at the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy annual meetings. Am J Pharm Educ. 2018;82(8):6409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6409.
Turcios ME, Agarwal NK, Watkins L. How much of library and information science literature qualifies as research? J Aca Librariansh. 2014;40(5):473–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.06.003.
Hider P, Pymm B. Empirical research methods reported in high-profile LIS journal literature. J Librariansh Inf Sci. 2008;30(2):108–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.11.007.
Koufogiannakis D, Slater L, Crumley E. A content analysis of librarianship research. J Info Sci. 2004;30(3):227–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504044668.
The EQUATOR Network: Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research [Internet]. EQUATOR Network [cited 2020 Dec 16]. Available from: https://www.equator-network.org/.
Eldredge JD, Phillips HE, Kroth PJ. Real-time peer review: an innovative feature to an evidence-based practice conference. Med Ref Serv Q. 2013;32(4):412–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2013.837690.
