A pilot study of the effects of faculty status for medical librarians in the United States
Keywords:faculty status, medical librarians, faculty perceptions
Objectives: Within many institutions, there are debates over whether medical librarians should be classified as faculty or professional staff, a distinction that may have considerable effect on the perception of librarians within their local institutions. This study is a pilot exploration of how faculty status may affect the professional experiences of academic medical librarians within their local institutions.
Methods: Surveys were sent to 209 medical librarians listed as having some instructional function at Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) accredited medical institutions in the United States. Survey responses were captured using Qualtrics survey tool and analyzed for frequencies and associations using SPSS version 27.
Results: Sixty-four medical librarians at academic medical institutions completed the survey developed for this study. Of the respondents, 60.9% indicated that librarians at their institution have faculty status, while 71.9% believe that librarians at their institution should have faculty status. Ninety percent of librarians with faculty status reported that they are expected to generate scholarly materials, compared to 28% of those without faculty status.
Conclusions: Many medical libraries offer faculty status to librarians. While many medical librarians are active in instruction, research, and other activities normally associated with faculty status, it is not clear if faculty status impacts how librarians are perceived by other health care workers within their institutions.
Antell K, Hahn SE. Faculty status: the next generation employment status preferences among millennial LIS students and new librarians at ARL institutions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2020 Nov 1;46(6):102250.
Slutsky B, Aytac S. Publication patterns of science, technology, and medical librarians: review of the 2008–2012 published research. Science & Technology Libraries. 2014 Oct 2;33(4):369–82.
Coker C, vanDuinkerken W, Bales S. Seeking full citizenship: a defense of tenure faculty status for librarians. College & Research Libraries. 2010:71(5):406–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-54r1.
Cronin B. The mother of all myths. Libr J. 2001 Feb 15;126(3):144.
Galbraith Q, Garrison M, Hales W. Perceptions of faculty status among academic librarians. College & Research Libraries. 2016:77(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.582.
Leonhardt TW. Behind the scenes. Technicalities. 2004 Aug;24(4):3–5.
Eldredge JD, Heskett KM, Henner T, Tan JP. Current practices in library/informatics instruction in academic libraries serving medical schools in the Western United States: a three-phase action research study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:119.
Julien H, Genuis SK. Librarians’ experiences of the teaching role: a national survey of librarians. Libr Inf Sc Res. 2011 Apr 1;33(2):103–11.
Nevius AM, Ettien A, Link AP, Sobel LY. Library instruction in medical education: a survey of current practices in the United States and Canada. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):98–107.
Brown JF, Nelson JL. Integration of information literacy into a revised medical school curriculum. Med Ref Serv Q. 2003;22(3):63–74.
MacEachern M, Townsend W, Young K, Rana G. Librarian integration in a four-year medical school curriculum: a timeline. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31(1):105–14.
Berg SA, Banks M. Beyond competencies: naming librarians’ capacity for research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2016 Jul 1;42(4):469–71.
Bullion JW, Brower SM. Enhancing the research and publication efforts of health sciences librarians via an academic writing retreat. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):394–9.
Love E. Research: the third dimension of librarianship. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1980 Jan;68(1):1–5.
Rossall H, Boyes C, Montacute K, Doherty P. Developing research capacity in health librarians: a review of the evidence. Health Info Libr J. 2008 Sep;25(3):159–74.
Borrego Á, Pinfield S. Librarians publishing in partnership with other researchers: roles, motivations, benefits, and challenges. Portal. 2020;20(4):655–75.
Borrego Á, Ardanuy J, Urbano C. Librarians as research partners: their contribution to the scholarly endeavour beyond library and information science. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2018 Sep 1;44(5):663–70.
Hinrichs RJ, Bakker CJ, Brigham TJ, Ginier EC, Stevens GA, Alpi KM. Exploring interprofessional collaboration and attitudes of health sciences librarians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;108(3):440–51.
Janke R, Rush KL. The academic librarian as co-investigator on an interprofessional primary research team: a case study. Health Info Libr J. 2014 Jun;31(2):116–22.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Medical School Directory [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 29]. Available from: https://lcme.org/directory/.
Galbraith Q, Garrison M, Hales W. Perceptions of faculty status among academic librarians | Galbraith | College & Research Libraries. 2016;77(5):582–93.
Ivey RT. Teaching Faculty Perceptions of Academic Librarians at Memphis State University (Research Note). College & Research Libraries. 1994;55(1):69–82.
Bolin MK. Librarian status at US research universities: extending the typology. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2008 Sep 1;34(5):416–24.
Walters WH. Faculty status of librarians at U.S. research universities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2016 Mar 1;42(2):161–71.
Ackerman E, Hunter J, Wilkinson ZT. The availability and effectiveness of research supports for early career academic librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2018 Sep 1;44(5):553–68.
Saunders L. Faculty Perspectives on information literacy as a student learning outcome. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2012 Jul 1;38(4):226–36.
Weng C, Murray DC. Faculty perceptions of librarians and library services: exploring the impact of librarian faculty status and beyond. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2020 Sep 1;46(5):102200.