Implementation of the cognitive apprenticeship model for enhancement of advanced searching skills in a pharmacy academia rotation

Authors

  • Hilary Jasmin Assistant Professor, Health Sciences Library, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5115-1365
  • Kenneth Hohmeier Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
  • Christina Spivey Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Translational Science, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1108

Keywords:

instruction, pharmacy, rotation, cognitive apprenticeship

Abstract

Background: Pharmacy students are primarily taught literature searching skills didactically during their Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. To effect change in the area of advanced literature searching skills, a pharmacy librarian joined with two Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) preceptors to design and implement a crash course on applied systematic searching skills for a cohort of four students.

Case Presentation: Through the cognitive apprenticeship model, a Systematic Searching Crash Course (SSCC) was implemented among a cohort of four academic APPE students. Students developed search strategies using controlled vocabulary and free text, translated their searches into multiple databases, and used citation management software to build libraries of evidence. Additionally, the cohort blindly peer reviewed each other’s search strategies, wrote literature reviews, and finally conducted a search together without input from the pharmacy librarian.

Conclusions: Review of the pre-/post-course self-assessment taken by the cohort indicates the SSCC is a success in terms of improving student confidence in accessing and synthesizing primary literature. As the crash course is further refined and implemented, there may be more opportunity to embed the course into didactic curriculum and residency programs and to potentially reproduce it for other health science disciplines.

References

Humphreys BL. How to earn a reputation as a great partner. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018;106(4):521–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.504.

Lapidus M, Kostka-Rokosz MD, Dvorkin-Camiel L. Librarian-lead tutorial for enhancement of pharmacy students’ information-searching skills in advanced experiential rotations. Med Ref Serv Q. 2009;28(4):351–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02763860903249217.

Conlogue BC. Information literacy instruction for pharmacy students: a pharmacy librarian reflects on a year of teaching. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019;107(1):98–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.522.

Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education. Accreditation standards and key elements for the professional program in pharmacy leading to the doctor of pharmacy degree [Internet]. Chicago, IL: 2016 [cite 16 Sept 2020]. <https://www.acpe-accredit.org/pdf/Standards2016FINAL.pdf>.

Pittenger AL, Chapman SA, Frail CK, Moon JY, Undeberg MR, Orzoff JH. Entrustable professional activities for pharmacy practice. Am J Pharm Educ. 2016;80(4):57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80457.

Tetenbaum-Novatt JE, Lonie JM, Elkowitz DE, Frey KM. A novel learning approach to pharmaceutical sciences research in a pharmacy research advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) elective course. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018;10(11):1529–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.08.015.

Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

Vygotsky LS, Cole M, John-Steiner V, Scribner S, Souberman E. Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.

Phillips AC, Lewis LK, McEvoy MP, Galipeau J, Glasziou P, Moher D, Tilson JK, Williams MT. Development and validation of the guideline for reporting evidence-based practice educational interventions and teaching (GREET). BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0759-1.

Lyons K, McLaughlin JE, Khanova J, Roth MT. Cognitive apprenticeship in health sciences education: a qualitative review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017;22(3):723–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9707-4.

Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library. Systematic Searches [Internet]. New Haven, CT: [cited 5 Aug 2020]. <https://library.medicine.yale.edu/tutorials/subjects/systematic-searches>.

Collins A, Brown, JS, Newman SE. Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. Cent Stud Read Tech Rep. 1987(403).

Vanessa PD, Kerry JB. The cognitive apprenticeship model in educational practice. In: Spector JM, Merrill MD, van Merriënboer J, Driscoll MP, eds. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Routledge; 2007.

Marsh G, Ketterer J. Situation the zone of proximal development. Online J Dist Learn Admin. 2005;15(8):2.

Dennen VP. Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. In: Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2004. p. 813–28.

Song L, Singleton ES, Hill JR, Koh MH. Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet Higher Ed. 2004;7(1):59–70.

Kauffman H. A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. Res Learn Tech. 2015;23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507.

Downloads

Published

2022-02-11

Issue

Section

Case Report