A bibliometric study of research pertaining to the oldest-old (age eighty-five and older)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.762Keywords:
Oldest-Old, Elderly, Bibliometric, Gerontology, Authors, Journals, HealthAbstract
Objective: This bibliometric study investigated literature pertaining to a quickly growing population worldwide: the oldest-old, individuals age eighty-five and older. The current state of research was surveyed, based on top authors, publishers, authorship networks, themes in publication titles and abstracts, and highly cited publications.
Methods: Bibliographic data was abstracted from the Web of Science database. Microsoft Excel was used for data analyses related to top author, publishers, and terms. VosViewer bibliographic visualization software was used to identify authorship networks.
Results: Publications pertaining to the oldest-old have increased dramatically over the past three decades. The majority of these publications are related to medical or genetics topics. Citations for these publications remain relatively low but may be expected to grow in coming years, based on the publication behavior about and increasing prominence of this population. Claudio Franceschi and the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society were found to be the author and journal with the most publications pertaining to the oldest-old, respectively.
Conclusions: The oldest-old is a population of rapidly growing significance. Researchers in library and information science, gerontology, and beyond can benefit themselves and those they serve by participating in research and specialized services to marginalized populations like the oldest-old. This bibliometric study hopefully serves as a launch-point for further inquiry and research in the years to come.References
Poon LW, Cohen-Mansfield J. Understanding well-being in the oldest old. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
Vincent GK, Velkoff VA. The next four decades: the older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050 (no. 1138) [Internet]. US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau; 2010 [cited 21 May 2019]. <https://www.census.gov/prod/2010pubs/p25-1138.pdf>.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. Life expectancy [Internet]. The Centers; 2017 [cited 14 Jul 2019]. <https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/life-expectancy.htm>.
Arias E, Heron M, Xu J. United States life tables. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017 May 7;66(4):1–64.
Suzman RM, Willis DP, Manton KG. The oldest old. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1992.
Harris T, Kovar MG, Suzman R, Kleinman JC, Feldman JJ. Longitudinal study of physical ability in the oldest-old. Am J Pub Health. 1989 Jun;79(6):698–702. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.6.698.
Manton KG, Soldo BJ. Dynamics of health changes in the oldest old: new perspectives and evidence. Milbank Meml Fund Q. 1985 Spring;63(2):206–85. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3349881.
Soldo BJ, Manton KG. Changes in the health status and service needs of the oldest old: current patterns and future trends. Milbank Meml Fund Q. 1985 Spring;63(2):286–319. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3349882.
Manton KG, Stallard E. Cross-sectional estimates of active life expectancy for the US elderly and oldest-old populations. J Gerontol. 1991 May;46(3):S170–S182. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/46.3.S170.
Moed HF, Glanzel W, Schmoch U. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. New York, NY: Springer; 2005.
Glanzel W, Schubert A. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Moed HF, Glanzel W, Schmoch U. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research. New York, NY: Springer; 2005. p. 257–76.
Franceschi C, Bonafe M, Valensin S, Olivieri F, de Luca M, Ottaviani E, de Benedictis G. Inflamm-aging: an evolutionary perspective on immunoscience. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2000 Jun;908(1):244–54.
Baltes PB, Smith J. New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontol. 2003 Mar–Apr;49(2):123–35. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000067946.
Dominko M, Verbic M. Subjective well-being among the elderly: a bibliometric analysis. Qual Quant. 2019 May;53(3):1187–207.
Gu YH, Bai JB, Chen XL, Wu WW, Liu XX, Tan XD. Healthy aging: a bibliometric analysis of the literature. Exper Gerontol. 2019 Feb;116:93–105.
Shen C, Nguyen DT, Hsu P. Bibliometric networks and analytics on gerontology research. Libr Hi Tech. 2019;37(1):88–100.
Johnson CL. Differential expectations and realities: race, socioeconomic status and health of the oldest-old. Int J Aging Human Dev. 1994;38(1):13–27.
Williamson K, Asla T. Information behavior of people in the fourth age: implications for the conceptualization of information literacy. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2009 Apr;31(2):76–83.
