Alignment of library services with the research lifecycle
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.595Keywords:
Health Sciences Libraries, Biomedical Research, Research Lifecycle, Organizational ChangeAbstract
Objectives: This study sought to understand the needs of biomedical researchers related to the research lifecycle and the present state of library support for biomedical research.
Methods: Qualitative interview data were collected from biomedical researchers who were asked to describe their research activities from identifying a problem to measuring the impact of their findings. Health sciences library leaders were surveyed about the services that they currently provide or plan to provide in supporting biomedical research.
Results: Library services were strongest at the beginning and end of the research lifecycle but were weaker in the conducting phase of the research. Co-occurrence of codes from the qualitative data suggests that library services are on the fringe of rather than integrated into the research lifecycle.
Discussion: Findings from this study suggest that tradition-based service models of health sciences libraries are insufficient to meet the needs of biomedical researchers. Investments by libraries in services that integrate with the conducting phase of research are needed for libraries to remain relevant in their support of the research lifecycle.References
University of Central Florida Libraries Research Lifecycle Committee. Overview: research lifecycle [Internet]. Orlando, FL: The University; 2012 [cited 9 Jan 2018]. <https://library.ucf.edu/about/departments/scholarly-communication/overview-research-lifecycle/>.
Vaughan KTL, Hayes BE, Lerner RC, McElfresh KR, Pavlech L, Romito D, Reeves LH, Morris EN. Development of the research lifecycle model for library services. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):310–4. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.013.
National Institutes of Health (NIH). NIH approves strategic vision to transform National Library of Medicine [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: The Institutes [cited 28 Dec 2017]. <https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/nih-approves-strategic-vision-transform-national-library-medicine>.
Federer L. Defining data librarianship: a survey of competencies, skills, and training. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jul;106(3):294–303. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.306.
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2011. 457 p.
Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1989. 252 p.
Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research. NIH funding rank of US medical schools from 2006–2017 [Internet]. Horse Shoe, NC: The Institute [cited 18 Mar 2017]. <http://www.brimr.org/NIH_Awards/NIH_Awards.htm>.
Kuckartz U. Qualitative text analysis: a guide to methods, practice & using software. London, UK: SAGE Publications; 2014. 23 p.
Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks C. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018 Jul;52(4):1893–907. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods. 2006. Feb 18(1):59–82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org//10.1177/1525822X05279903.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010 Aug;84(2):523–38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Tennant M. Bioinformatics librarian: meeting the information needs of genetics and bioinformatics researchers. Ref Serv Rev. 2005;33(1):12–9.
Lyon JA, Tennant MR, Messner KR, Osterbur DL. Carving a niche: establishing bioinformatics collaborations. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jul;94(3):330–5.
Federer L. Exploring new roles for librarians: the research informationist. Morgan & Claypool; 2014. (Synthesis Lectures on Emerging Trends in Librarianship.)
Federer L. The librarian as research informationist: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):298–302. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.011.
Gutzman KE, Bales ME, Belter CW, Chambers T, Chan L, Holmes KL, Lu YL, Palmer LA, Reznik-Zellen RC, Sarli CC, Suiter AM, Wheeler TR. Research evaluation support services in biomedical libraries. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):1–14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.205.
Additional Files
- Appendix F: Frequency of researcher interview codes (n=17)
- Appendix E: Description of categories and code definitions for biomedical researcher interviews
- Appendix A: Research lifecycles
- Appendix D: Health sciences library leadership survey instrument
- Appendix C: Biomedical researcher interview instrument
- Appendix B: Potential sites for data collection
