Is there a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process?

Authors

  • Christina L. Wissinger Assistant Librarian and Health Sciences Liaison, Pennsylvania State University Libraries, University Park, PA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.387

Keywords:

Systematic Review, Undergraduate Students, Graduate Students

Abstract

Systematic reviews are a well-established and well-honed research methodology in the medical and health sciences fields. As the popularity of systematic reviews has increased, disciplines outside the sciences have started publishing them. This increase in familiarity has begun to trickle down from practitioners and faculty to graduate students and recently undergraduates. The amount of work and rigor that goes into producing a quality systematic review may make these types of research projects seem unattainable for undergraduate or graduate students, but is this an accurate assumption? This commentary discusses whether there is a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process. It explains the possible benefits of having undergraduate and graduate students engage in systematic reviews and concludes with ideas for creating basic education or training opportunities for researchers and students who are new to the systematic review process.

Author Biography

Christina L. Wissinger, Assistant Librarian and Health Sciences Liaison, Pennsylvania State University Libraries, University Park, PA

Assistant Librarain for the Health Sciences

References

Koffel JB, Rethlefsen ML. Reproducibility of search strategies is poor in systematic reviews published in high-impact pediatrics, cardiology and surgery journals: a cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE. 2016 Sep 26;11(9):1–16. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163309.

Schardt C. Are all systemic reviews created equal? [Internet]. Chicago, IL: Medical Library Association [cited 20 Oct 2017]. <http://www.medlib-ed.org/products/1152/are-all-systematic-reviews-created-equal>.

Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pralap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Statist Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1635–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.1190.

PRISMA. Flow diagram [Internet]. [rev. 2015; cited 20 Oct 2017]. <http://prisma-statement.org/PRISMAStatement/FlowDiagram.aspx>.

Boland A, Cherry MG, Dickson R. Doing a systematic review: a student’s guide. London, UK: Sage; 2014.

Albanese MA, Snow MH, Skochelak SE, Hugget KN, Farrell PM. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med. 2001 Mar;78(3):313–21.

Petticrew M, Roberts HS. Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2006.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-05

Issue

Section

Commentary