Library instruction in medical education: a survey of current practices in the United States and Canada
Keywords:Canada, Curriculum, Education, Medical, Evidence-Based Medicine, Information Literacy, Faculty, Libraries, Schools, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States
Objective: The most recent survey on instruction practices in libraries affiliated with accredited medical institutions in the United States was conducted in 1996. The present study sought to update these data, while expanding to include Canadian libraries. Additional analysis was undertaken to test for statistically significant differences between library instruction in the United States and Canada and between libraries affiliated with highly ranked and unranked institutions.
Methods: A twenty-eight-question survey was distributed to libraries affiliated with accredited US and Canadian medical schools to assess what and how often librarians teach, as well as how librarians are involved in the curriculum committee and if they are satisfied with their contact with students and faculty. Quantitative data were analyzed with SAS, R, and MedCalc.
Results: Most of the seventy-three responding libraries provided instruction, both asynchronously and synchronously. Library instruction was most likely to be offered in two years of medical school, with year one seeing the most activity. Database use was the most frequently taught topic, and libraries reported a median of five librarians providing instruction, with larger staffs offering slightly more education sessions per year. Libraries associated with highly ranked schools were slightly more likely to offer sessions that were integrated into the medical school curriculum in year four and to offer sessions in more years overall.
Conclusions: In US and Canadian libraries, regardless of the rank of the affiliated medical school, librarians’ provision of instruction in multiple formats on multiple topics is increasingly common.
This article has been approved for the Medical Library Association’s Independent Reading Program.
Weiskotten, HG, Schwitalla AM, Cutter WD, Anderson HH. Medical education in the United States 1934–1939. Prepared for the Council on Medical Education and Hospitals of the American Medical Association. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 1940. (Available from: <http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.b4210082;view=1up;seq=9>. [cited 9 Sep 2015].)
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and structure of a medical school: standards for accreditation of medical education programs leading to the MD degree, 2018/19 [Internet]. The Committee [Mar 2017; cited 20 Jun 2017]. <http://lcme.org/wp-content/uploads/filebase/standards/2018-19_Functions-and-Structure_2017-08-02.docx>.
Earl MF. Library instruction in the medical school curriculum: a survey of medical college libraries. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Apr:84(2);191–5. [cited 9 Sep 2015].
Eldredge JD, Heskett KM, Henner T, Tan JP. Current practices in library/informatics instruction in academic libraries serving medical schools in the western United States: a three-phase action research study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(119):1–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-119.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Medical school directory [Internet]. Washington, DC: The Committee [2014; cited 4 Oct 2017]. <http://lcme.org/directory/>.
US Census Bureau. 2010 geographic terms and concepts - census divisions and census regions [Internet]. Suitland, MD: The Bureau [2010; cited 29 Sep 2017]. <https://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/gtc_census_divreg.html>.
Library of Parliament. Guide to the Canadian House of Commons [Internet]. Ottawa, ON: Library of Parliament [2011; cited 8 Jun 2015]. <http://www.lop.parl.gc.ca/About/Parliament/GuideToHoC/index-e.htm>.
TOP UNIVERSITIES. QS world university rankings by subject 2014 – medicine [Internet]. London, UK: QS Quacquarelli Symonds [2014; cited 26 Sep 2017]. <https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2014/medicine>.
Miller JM. Issues surrounding the administration of a credit course for medical students: survey of US academic health sciences librarians. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Jul;92(3):354–63. [cited 1 Sep 2015].
Mi M. Application of instructional design principles in developing an online information literacy curriculum. Med Ref Serv Q. 2016;351(1):112–21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2016.1117298.
Richardson JE, Bouquin DR, Tmanova LL, Wright D. Information and informatics literacies of first-year medical students. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Oct;103(4):198–202. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.008.
Pickett KM. Resource format preferences across the medical curriculum. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):193–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.003.
Getselman A, White MS. Use of a pre-assessment tool to start a meaningful dialogue: new paradigms in library instruction. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011;30(3):245–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2011.590414.
Burrows SC, Tylman V. Evaluating medical student searches of MEDLINE for evidence-based information: process and application of results. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Oct;87(4):471–6. [cited 20 Jun 2017].
MacEachern M, Townsend W, Young K, Rana G. Librarian integration in a four-year medical school curriculum: a timeline. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012 Jan;31(1):105–14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2012.641856.
Gardner SJ, Juricek JE, Xu FG. An analysis of academic library web pages for faculty. J Acad Librariansh. 2008 Jan;34(1):16–24. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2007.11.006.
Chen K, Lin P, Chang SS. Integrating library instruction into a problem-based learning curriculum. Aslib Proc. 2011;63(5):517–32.
Lynn VA. Foundations of database searching: integrating evidence-based medicine into the medical curriculum. Med Ref Serv Q. 2010 Apr;29(2):121–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763861003723176.
Hurst EJ. Educational technologies in health science libraries: teaching technology skills. Med Ref Serv Q. 2014;33(1):102–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2013.866494.
Cooper ID, Crum JA. New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: a systematic review, 1990–2012. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):268–77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.008.
Boruff T, Storie D. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Jan;102(1):22–30. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.006.
Stokes A, Light J, Haines LL. Library support of mobile resources during clinical clerkships. Med Ref Serv Q. 2014;33(2):179–94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2014.897519.
Brown JF, Nelson JL. Integration of information literacy into a revised medical school curriculum. Med Ref Serv Q. 2003;22(3):63–74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J115v22n03_07.
Bronson Fitzpatrick R. Family practice clerkship information seminars. Med Ref Serv Q. 2004;23(4):13–24.
Hart JK, Newton BW, Boone SE. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences electronic health record and medical informatics training for undergraduate health professionals. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jul;98(3):212–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.98.3.007.
Hatfield AJ, Brahmi FA. Angel: post-implementation evaluation at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Med Ref Serv Q. 2004;23(3):1–15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J115v23n03_01.
Travis TA. Librarians as agents of change: working with curriculum committees using change agency theory. New Dir Teach Learn. 2008 Summer;114:17–33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.314.
Linton AM. Emerging roles for librarians in the medical school curriculum and the impact on professional identity. Med Ref Serv Q. 2016 Oct–Dec;35(4):414–33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2016.1220758.
Francis BW, Kelly JA. Active learning: its role in health sciences libraries. Med Ref Serv Q. 1997;16(1):25–37.
Clairoux N, Desbiens S, Clar M, Dupont P, St-Jean M. Integrating information literacy in health sciences curricula: a case study from Quebec. Health Inf Libr J. 2013 Sep;30(3):201–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12025.
Brooks SV, Bigelow S. Preparing students for research: faculty/librarian collaboration in a pre-doctoral physical therapy research course. Health Inf Libr J. 2015;32(4):332–8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hir.12123.
Dent JA, Harden RM. A practical guide for medical teachers. 4th ed. London, UK; New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2013. 436 p.
Julien H. Information literacy instruction in Canadian academic libraries: longitudinal trends and international comparisons. Coll Res Libr. 2000;61(6):510–23.
Ennis D, Medaille A, Lambert T, Kelley R, Harris FC. A comparison of academic libraries: an analysis using a self-organizing map. Perform Meas Metrics. 2013 Apr;14(2):118–31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PMM-07-2012-0026.
Willingham P, Carder L, Millson-Martula C. Does a border make a difference? library instruction in the United States and Canada. J Acad Librariansh. 2006 Jan;32(1):23–34. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2005.10.002.
Joubert DJ, Lee TP. Empowering your institution through assessment. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jan;95(1):46–53. [cited 20 Sep 2016].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.