A qualitative analysis of the information science needs of public health researchers in an academic setting
Keywords:Needs Assessment, Public Health, Academic Researchers, Qualitative Stud
Objectives: The University of Minnesota (UMN) Health Sciences Libraries conducted a needs assessment of public health researchers as part of a multi-institutional study led by Ithaka S+R. The aims of the study were to capture the evolving needs, opportunities, and challenges of public health researchers in the current environment and provide actionable recommendations. This paper reports on the data collected at the UMN site.
Methods: Participants (n=24) were recruited through convenience sampling. One-on-one interviews, held November 2016 to January 2017, were audio-recorded. Qualitative analyses were conducted using NVivo 11 Pro and were based on the principles of grounded theory.
Results: The data revealed that a broad range of skill levels among participants (e.g., literature searching) and areas of misunderstanding (e.g., current publishing landscape, open access options). Overall, data management was an afterthought. Few participants were fully aware of the breadth of librarian knowledge and skill sets, although many did express a desire for further skill development in information science.Conclusions: Libraries can engage more public health researchers by utilizing targeted and individualized marketing regarding services. We can promote open science by educating researchers on publication realities and enhancing our data visualization skills. Libraries might take an institution-wide leadership role on matters of data management and data policy compliance. Finally, as team science emerges as a research priority, we can offer our networking expertise. These support services may reduce the stresses that public health researchers feel in the current research environment.
How science goes wrong. Economist [Internet]. 21 Oct 2013 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069-scientific-research-has-changed-world-now-it-needs-change-itself-how-science-goes-wrong>.
Marinetto M. How can we tackle the thorny problem of fraudulent research? Guardian [Internet]. 13 Mar 2017 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2017/mar/13/fraudulent-research-academic-misconduct-solutions>.
Engber D. Is science broken? or is it self-correcting? Slate [Internet]. 21 Aug 2017 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2017/08/science_is_not_self_correcting_science_is_broken.html>.
Carroll AE. Science needs a solution for the temptation of positive results. N Y Times [Internet]. 29 May 2017 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/29/upshot/science-needs-a-solution-for-the-temptation-of-positive-results.html>.
Atkinson-Bonasio A. 9 views on how technology can transform research and open up science. Elsevier Connect [Internet]. 16 Oct 2013 [cited 7 Nov 2017] <https://www.elsevier.com/connect/9-views-on-how-technology-can-transform-research-and-open-up-science>.
Jablonski JA. How research method technologies have changed over time. Online Learning Tips [Internet]. 11 Apr 2015 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <http://onlinelearningtips.com/2015/04/how-research-method-technologies-have-changed-over-time/>.
Ponte D, Mierzejewska BI, Klein S. The transformation of the academic publishing market: multiple perspectives on innovation. Electron Mark. 2017 May;27(2):97–100. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12525-017-0250-9.
Britt R. Universities report continuing decline in federal R&D funding in FY 2014 (NSF 16-302) [Internet]. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation; Nov 2015 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsf16302/>.
Barbour V, Chinnock P, Cohen B, Yamey G. The impact of open access upon public health. Bull World Health Organ. 2006 May;84(5):337–424.
Camargo K, Grant R. Public health, science, and policy debate: being right is not enough. Am J Public Health. 2015 Feb;105(2):232–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302241.
Michie S, Yardley L, West R, Patrick K, Greaves F. Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jun;19(6):e232. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7126.
Shapshak P. Challenges in health research funding: an opinion. Bioinformation. 2015 Feb;11(2):55–6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6026/97320630011055.
Last JM, Spasoff RA, Harris SS. A dictionary of epidemiology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Advancing the nation’s health: a guide to public health research needs, 2006–2015 [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; Dec 2006 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11428>.
Mullen LB, Otto JJ. Open access policymaking: roles for academic librarians as “change agents” in research institutions. Qual Quant Methods Libr. 2014;1:295–307.
Federer L. The librarian as research informationist: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):298–302. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.011.
Jaguszewski JM, Williams K. New roles for new times: transforming liaison roles in research libraries [Internet]. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries; Aug 2013 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <http://www.arl.org/publications-resources/2893-new-roles-for-new-times-transforming-liaison-roles-in-research-libraries>.
Cooper ID, Crum JA. New activities and changing roles of health sciences librarians: a systematic review, 1990–2012. J Med Libr Assoc. 2013 Oct;101(4):268–77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.101.4.008.
Surkis A, LaPolla FWZ, Contaxis N, Read KB. Data day to day: building a community of expertise to address data skills gaps in an academic medical center. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Apr;105(2):185–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.35.
Jacobs JA, Jones E, Gabella BA, Spring B, Brownson RC. Tools for implementing an evidence-based approach in public health practice. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:110324. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110324.
LaPelle NR, Luckmann R, Simpson EH, Martin ER. Identifying strategies to improve access to credible and relevant information for public health professionals: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2006 Apr;6(6):89.
McClanahan KJ. Information behavior of public health educators working in Appalachia [dissertation] [Internet]. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee; May 2011 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/998>.
Yu X, Xie Y, Pan X, Mayfield-Johnson S, Whipple J, Azadbakht E. Developing an evidence-based public health informatics course. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Oct;103(4):194–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.007.
Curtis KL, Weller AC, Hurd JM. Information-seeking behavior of health sciences faculty: the impact of new information technologies. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997 Oct;85(4):402–10.
Wallis LC. Information-seeking behavior of faculty in one school of public health. J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Oct;94(4):442–6, e214–e217.
Barr-Walker J. Evidence-based information needs of public health workers: a systematized review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):69–79. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.109.
Gebbie K, Rosenstock L, Hernandez LM, eds., Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Who will keep the public healthy? educating public health professionals for the 21st century [Internet]. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://www.nap.edu/read/10542/>.
Best graduate public health programs. US News World Rep [Internet]. 2015 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-health-schools/public-health-rankings>.
University of Minnesota School of Public Health. School at a glance [Internet]. The University; 2017 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <http://www.sph.umn.edu/about/facts-figures/>.
NVivo 11 Pro. QSR International; 2015.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company; 1967.
Library of Congress. Sustainability of digital formats: planning for Library of Congress collections: Microsoft Access MDB file format family [Internet]. 27 Jul 2017 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://www.loc.gov/preservation/digital/formats/fdd/fdd000462.shtml>.
Beahler CC, Sundheim JJ, Trapp NI. Information retrieval in systematic reviews: challenges in the public health arena. Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4):6–10.
D’Adamo M, Fabic MS, Ohkubo S. Meeting the health information needs of health workers: what have we learned? J Health Commun. 2012;17(supp 2):23–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.666626.
Haines LL, Light J, O’Malley D, Delwiche FA. Information-seeking behavior of basic science researchers: implications for library services. J Med Libr Assoc. 2010 Jan;98(1):73–81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.98.1.019.
Tennant MR, Cataldo TT. Development and assessment of specialized liaison librarian services. Med Ref Serv Q. 2002 Summer;21(2):21–37.
Guardiola A, Barratt MS, Omoruyi EA. Impact of individualized learning plans on United States senior medical students advanced clinical rotations. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2016 Nov;13:39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.39.
Dreyfus SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc. 2004 Jun;24(3):177–81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992.
Aaker JL, Brumbaugh AM, Grier SA. Nontarget markets and viewer distinctiveness: the impact of target marketing on advertising attitudes. J Consum Psychol. 2000;9(3):127–40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP0903_1.
van Pahuis WG, Paul P, Emerson C, Grefenstette J, Wilder R, Herbst AJ, Heymann D, Burke DS. A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health. BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov;14(1):1144. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1144.
Pinfield S, Cox AM, Smith J. Research data management and libraries: relationships, activities, drivers and influences. PLOS ONE. 2014 Dec;9(12):e114734. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114734.
Saunders PA, Wilhelm EE, Lee S, Merkofer E, Shoulson I. Data sharing for public health research: a qualitative study of industry and academia. Commun Med. 2014;11(2):179–87.
Katzenback JR, Steffen I, Kronley C. Culture change that sticks. Harvard Bus Rev [Internet]. Aug 2012 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://hbr.org/2012/07/cultural-change-that-sticks>.
McGuigan G, Russell R. The business of academic publishing: a strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing. Electron J Acad Spec Libr. 2008 Winter;9(3):1–11.
van Noorden R. Open access: the true cost of science publishing. Nature. 2013 Mar;495(7442):426–9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/495426a.
Björk BC. The hybrid model for open access publication of scholarly articles: a failed experiment? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2012 Aug;63(8):1496–504. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22709.
Lwoga ET, Questier F. Faculty adoption and usage behaviour of open access scholarly communication in health science universities. New Libr World. 2014;115(3/4):116–39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/NLW-01-2014-0006.
Bakker C, Stephenson C, Stephenson E, Chaves D. Public funding and open access to research: a review of Canadian multiple sclerosis research. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb;19(2):e52. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6250.
Pinfield S, Salter J, Bath PA. The “total cost of publication” in a hybrid open-access environment: institutional approaches to funding journal article-processing charges in combination with subscriptions. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2016 Jul;67(7):1751–66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23446.
Solomon D, Björk BC. Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. Peer J. 2016 Jul;4:e2264. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2264.
Borgman CL. Big data, little data, no data: scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2015.
McCrorie AD, Donnelly C, McGlade KJ. Infographics: healthcare communication for the digital age. Ulster Med J. 2016 May;85(2):71–5.
Otten JJ, Cheng K, Drewnowski A. Infographics and public policy: using data visualization to convey complex information. Health Aff. 2015 Nov;34(11):1901–7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0642.
Brandenburg MD, Joque J. Contextualizing visualization in library services. In: Federer L, ed. The Medical Library Association guide to data management for librarians. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield and Medical Library Association; 2017. p. 139–50.
Ellis APJ, West BJ, Ryan AM, DeShon RP. The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: a function of question type? J Appl Psychol. 2002 Dec;87(6):1200–8.
Peck JA, Levashina J. Impression management and interview and job performance ratings: a meta-analysis of research design with tactics in mind. Front Psychol. 2017 Feb;8:201. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00201.
Scopelliti I, Loewenstein G, Vosgerau J. You call it “self-exuberance”; I call it “bragging.” Psychol Sci. 2015 Jun;26(6):903–14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797615573516.
Garfield E. Is there room in science for self-promotion? Scientist [Internet]. Dec 1987 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/9200/title/Is-There-Room-in-Science-for-Self-Promotion-/>.
Duque L. How academics and researchers can get more out of social media. Harvard Bus Rev [Internet]. Jun 2016 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://hbr.org/2016/06/how-academics-and-researchers-can-get-more-out-of-social-media>.
Kelly N. Congress totally ignored Trump’s cuts to NIH funding. Atlantic [Internet]. May 2017 [cited 7 Nov 2017]. <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/the-new-gop-budget-rejects-trumps-cuts-to-nih/524895/>.
Ebadi A, Schiffauerova A. How to receive more funding for your research? get connected to the right people! PLOS ONE. 2015 Jul;10(7):e0133061. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133061.
Knapp JA. Plugging the “whole”: librarians as interdisciplinary facilitators. Libr Rev. 2012;61(3):199–214. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242531211259328.