Academic librarians as navigators of institutional data policies: developing resources to facilitate compliant research data management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2026.2404Keywords:
Data Management, academic librarians, data policy, federal regulation, educational guidanceAbstract
Background: Proper research data management requires complying with data policies that ensure the ethical, effective, and efficient collection, storage, and sharing of research data. Medical librarians have made increasing inroads to leading research data management instruction and institutional efforts to comply with federal policies like the NIH Data Management and Sharing Policy. However, there has been less discussion about how medical librarians can support researcher compliance with institutional data policies. After observing patterns in requests for guidance, two data services librarians developed decision-making tools to help researchers identify appropriate local resources for their data sharing and re-use needs.
Case Presentation: The paper describes four projects that were developed with a similar methodology for the purpose of guiding patrons through institutional policies and processes: (1) a decision tree for determining when a data transfer or use agreement is required; (2) a matching tool that identifies appropriate data transfer platforms for specific data characteristics or scenarios; (3) a decision tree for determining whether a researcher needs to seek out Institutional Review Board (IRB) review for a project that uses secondary data analysis; and (4) a flowchart detailing data de-identification processes and institutional tools available for specific data formats. The creation of each resource entailed information gathering from local experts as well as review of internal policies to produce action-oriented guidance to solve common researcher problems.
Conclusions: These efforts demonstrate how librarians can utilize their skills and develop cross-departmental collaborations to help patrons navigate an increasingly complicated data ecosystem, particularly where that ecosystem is informed both by external policies (e.g., policies for de-identification) and internal tools (e.g., data transfer tools). The decision trees have helped researchers make choices about their own data management approaches so that they comply with external and internal policies. These documents also enable stakeholders to identify gaps in institutional policies and resources. The development of these resources has had the additional benefit of strengthening partnerships and positioning librarians as collaborators for policy decisions involving research data.
References
1. Read K, LaPolla FWZ. A new hat for librarians: providing REDCap support to establish the library as a central data hub. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2018 Jan;106(1):120–6.
2. Surkis A, LaPolla FWZ, Contaxis N, Read KB. Data Day to Day: building a community of expertise to address data skills gaps in an academic medical center. J Med Libr Assoc JMLA. 2017;105(2):185–91.
3. Yee M, Surkis A, Lamb I, Contaxis N. The NYU Data Catalog: a modular, flexible infrastructure for data discovery. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. 2023 Sep 25;30(10):1693–700.
4. Ossom Williamson P. Developing a Centralized Hub for Research Data Services: Trainings and Resources in Health Sciences Contexts. J EScience Librariansh [Internet]. 2023 Feb 16 [cited 2025 Dec 30];12(1). Available from: https://publishing.escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/article/id/642/
5. Hofelich Mohr A, Johnston LR, Lindsay TA. The Data Management Village: Collaboration among Research Support Providers in the Large Academic Environment. In: Kellam L, Thompson K, editors. Databrarianship: The Academic Data Librarian in Theory and Practice [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/181127
6. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Health Research and the Privacy of Health Information: The HIPAA Privacy Rule. Introduction. In: Nass S, Levit L, Gostin L, editors. Beyond the HIPAA Privacy Rule: Enhancing Privacy and Improving Health through Research [Internet]. National Academies Press (US); 2009. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9576/
7. Metcalf J. Big data analytics and revision of the common rule. Commun ACM. 2016 Jun 24;59(7):31–3.
8. Wickham RJ. Secondary Analysis Research. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2019;10(4):395–400.
9. Tedersoo L, Küngas R, Oras E, Köster K, Eenmaa H, Leijen Ä, et al. Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines. Sci Data. 2021 Jul 27;8(1):192.
10. Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). Human Subject Regulations Decision Charts [Internet]. Regulations, Policy and Guidance. 2020 [cited 2025 Dec 30]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/decision-charts/index.html
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michelle Yee, Nicole Contaxis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
