Standards for vision science librarians: 2026 review and revisions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2026.2270Keywords:
Vision Sciences, optometry, ophthalmology, Association of Vision Science Librarians (AVSL), Standards, Professional Competence, Professional Core Competency, Collection DevelopmentAbstract
The Association of Vision Science Librarians (AVSL) is an international organization composed of professional librarians, or persons acting in that capacity, whose collections include vision-related materials and/or whose patrons include vision scientists. Since 1976, AVSL has defined standards for vision science libraries in all capacities, including optometry, ophthalmology, academia, industry, and beyond.
As the most recent Standards for Vision Science Libraries was published in 2014, an AVSL member committee was formed in 2024 to review the Standards and consider what a revision should include. Over the course of several months, committee members collaborated with one another, held discussions with other AVSL members, and reviewed current literature. What resulted is a revised set of Standards that aims to address the significant changes that have taken place not only within the field of librarianship, but with the information needs of the vision science professions as well.
These updated Standards place the focus on the librarian rather than the library, as many librarian positions that once focused solely on vision science are now expected to manage several disciplines. The aim of this revision is to serve as a starting point for any librarian working with vision science materials and/or serving vision scientist patrons who wishes to develop their knowledge base and skills in this particular field of health sciences librarianship.
References
1. Association of Vision Science Librarians. Who we are [Internet]. Association of Vision Science Librarians. [cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://avsl.super.site/who-we-are
2. Motte K, Brooke Caldwell C, Lamson KS, Ferimer S, Nims JC. Standards for vision science libraries: 2014 revision. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014;102(4):288-291. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.4.010
3. Ashiq M, Jabeen F, Mahmood K. Transformation of libraries during Covid-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Acad Libr. 2022;48(4):102534. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACALIB.2022.102534
4. Edmonds H. Citing & copyright: citation styles [Internet]. NECO Library [cited 22 Aug 2024]. https://library.neco.edu/citation-copyright
5. U.S. copyright office fair use index [Internet]. Copyright.gov [cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/
6. Amsen E. How to avoid being duped by predatory journals. BMJ. 2024;384:q452. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q452
7. Bakri SJ, Shah SM. Predatory conferences: calling for vigilance from ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;230:178-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.03.027
8. Vetted journals list [Internet]. Association of Vision Science Librarians [Cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://avsl.super.site/vetted-journals-list
9. Vision-related MeSH headings [Internet]. Association of Vision Science Librarians [cited 30 Jan 2026]. https://avsl.super.site/vision-related-mesh
10. Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):617-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2014.11.025
11. Meert D, Torabi N, Costella J. Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(4):267-277. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.004
12. Cochrane Eyes and Vision. Home page [Internet]. Eyes.cochrane.org [cited 6 March 2025]. https://eyes.cochrane.org/
13. Scaffolding instruction toolkit: best practices [Internet]. PALNI [cited 22 Aug 2024]. https://libguides.palni.edu/c.php?g=930607&p=6706163
14. The Association of College and Research Libraries. Framework for information literacy for higher education [Internet]. American Library Association; 2016 [cited 22 Aug 2024]. https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
15. Accreditation Council on Optometric Education. Professional optometric degree program standards [Internet]. Accreditation Council on Optometric Education; 2025 [cited 12 Dec 2025]. https://theacoe.org/resources/professional-optometric-degree-programs
16. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Ophthalmology [Internet]. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; 2025 [cited 5 Sep 2025]. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/2025-reformatted-requirements/240_ophthalmalogy_2025_reformatted.pdf
17. Association of Schools and Colleges of Optometry. Educational technology guidelines for schools and colleges of optometry [Internet]. Optometriceducation.org; 2012 [cited 22 Aug 2024]. https://optometriceducation.org/files/EducationalTechnologyGuidelines.pdf
18. MacDonald KA, Hrynchak PK, Spafford MM. Evidence-based practice instruction by faculty members and librarians in North American optometry and ophthalmology programs. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014;102(3):210-215. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.102.3.013
19. Nielsen LD, Løwe MM, Mansilla F, et al. Interventions, methods and outcome measures used in teaching evidence-based practice to healthcare students: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:306. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05259-8
20. Lo LS. AI policies across the globe: Implications and recommendations for libraries. IFLA J. 2023;49(4):645-649. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352231196172
21. Pearl R. 5 ways ChatGPT will change healthcare forever, for better [Internet]. Forbes; 2023 [cited 22 Aug 2024]. https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertpearl/2023/02/13/5-ways-chatgpt-will-change-healthcare-forever-for-better/
22. Anton N, Doroftei B, Curteanu S, et al. Comprehensive review on the use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology and future research directions. Diagnostics. 2023;13(1):100. https://doi.org/10.3390/DIAGNOSTICS13010100
23. Montesi M, Bornstein BÁ, Ochando MB, Díez AS, Puig NB. AILIS 1.0: a new framework to measure AI literacy in library and information science (LIS). J Academic Librarianship. 2025;51:103118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2025.103118
24. Hervieux S, Wheatley A. White paper for AI Framework [Internet]. Choice 360 [cited 6 Feb 2026]. https://www.choice360.org/research/white-paper-building-an-ai-literacy-framework-perspectives-from-instruction-librarians-and-current-information-literacy-tools
25. MacDougall R, Ruediger D, Kelber N, Chen Z. Integrating AI literacy into the curricula: a new cohort project gets underway [Internet]. ITHAKA S+R [cited 6 Feb 2026]. https://sr.ithaka.org/blog/integrating-ai-literacy-into-the-curricula/
26. Lee AG, Boldt HC, Golnik KC, et al. Using the journal club to teach and assess competence in practice-based learning and improvement: a literature review and recommendation for implementation. Surv Ophthalmol. 2005;50(6):542-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2005.08.002
27. Yadgari M, Kalantarion M, Ahmady S, Sadoughi M-M, Shahriari M-H. Enhancing ophthalmology education through a mobile flipped classroom: a new teaching method. BMC Res Notes. 2025;18:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-025-07104-7
28. Collecting levels [Internet]. Library of Congress [cited 25 Jul 2024]. https://www.loc.gov/acq/devpol/cpc.html
29. Library of Congress classification outline [Internet]. Library of Congress [cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcco/
30. Outline of the NLM classification [Internet]. National Library of Medicine [cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://classification.nlm.nih.gov/outline
31. Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association. Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing; 2022 [Internet]. Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association [cited 5 Mar 2025]. https://www.oaspa.org/resources/principles-of-transparency-and-best-practice-in-scholarly-publishing/
32. Opening day list [Internet]. Association of Vision Science Librarians [cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://avsl.super.site/vision-related-content/opening-day-list
33. The essential collection development tool for health sciences libraries [Internet]. Doody’s Core Titles [cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://www.doody.com/dct/
34. DOCLINE [Internet]. National Library of Medicine [cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://www.nnlm.gov/about/DOCLINE
35. The CONTU final report [Internet]. The National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works [cited 30 Jan 2026]. https://digital-law-online.info/CONTU/PDF/
36. Get involved [Internet]. Association of Vision Science Librarians [cited 30 Jan 2026]. https://avsl.super.site/get-involved
37. Home page [Internet]. The Medical Library Association [cited 6 Mar 2025]. https://www.mlanet.org/
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Heather Edmonds, Karen S. Alcorn, Caroline Allen, Rudy Barreras, Dede Rios, PhD, MS , Leslie Holland, Thandavarayan Kumaragurupari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
