Evidence-based design of vaccine hesitancy information resources for health care providers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2026.2135Keywords:
vaccine hesitancy, clinical information resources, Evidence-Based Librarianship, qualitative data analysisAbstract
Background: The University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries (HSCL) sought to address the increasing challenge of vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic by developing evidence-based information resources for health care providers. To do this, HSCL librarians assessed the vaccine hesitancy information needs of local health care providers to design a resource that could be used to support conversations with vaccine hesitant patients at the point of care.
Case Presentation: A team of six librarians, supported by student research assistants, conducted interviews with 20 health care providers in north central Florida. The interviews, conducted via Zoom, focused on providers’ experiences with vaccine-hesitant patients. Content analysis of the transcribed interviews identified key themes, including trust, individualized conversations, and the impact of misinformation. The team developed a resource guide based on these findings, featuring curated information to support providers in vaccine discussions.
Conclusions: The results highlighted the importance of trust in patient-provider relationships and the challenges posed by misinformation. Providers expressed a need for diverse, accessible resources to aid in conversations about vaccines. The resulting resource guide, disseminated through local health networks, aims to enhance providers’ ability to address vaccine hesitancy effectively. This project underscores the critical role of librarians in public health initiatives and the value of collaborative efforts to combat vaccine hesitancy.
References
1. Ma J, Wang T, Lund B. Analyzing Public Libraries as Civic Agents in Advocating for COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake. Public Library Quarterly. 2023 April 43(4), 464–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2023.2197842
2. Ansell M, Adkins L, Edwards M, Morgan-Daniel J, Norton H, Stoyan-Rosenzweig N. Health Care Provider COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Information Needs Research: A Strategic Opportunity Project Proposal. Gainesville, Florida; 2021.
3. UF Health. UF Health Shands Community Health Needs Assessment 2022 Report [Internet]. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida Health; 2022 Jun [cited 2024 Sep 6] p. 1–53. Available from: https://ufhealth.thehcn.net/content/sites/ufhealth/CHNA_2022/2022_UFHealthShands-CHNA.pdf
4. King WC, Rubinstein M, Reinhart A, Mejia R. Time trends, factors associated with, and reasons for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A massive online survey of US adults from January-May 2021. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0260731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260731. PMID: 34932583
5. Maxwell, J. Chapter 6. Validity. How might you be wrong? in: Luttrell, W. (ed), Qualitative Educational Research. Abingdon, Routledge. 2021.
6. Patton, MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. 2014.
7. American Psychological Association. Using psychology to understand and fight health misinformation. An APA consensus statement [Internet]. 2023 Nov [updated 2024 Mar; cited 2025 Apr 8]. Available from: https://www.apa.org/pubs/reports/health-misinformation
8. Ansell M. Guides @ UF: Vaccine Hesitancy Resources: General Resources [Internet]. [cited 2024 Nov 7]. Available from: https://guides.uflib.ufl.edu/vaccinehesitancy/general
9. Vaccines and US | Smithsonian Institution [Internet]. [cited 2024 Nov 7]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20230121034109/https://www.si.edu/vaccinesandus
10. Home | Vaccine Resource Hub [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 7]. Available from: https://vaccineresourcehub.org/
11. University of Washington. Resources [Internet]. Center for an Informed Public. 2020 [cited 2024 Nov 7]. Available from: https://www.cip.uw.edu/resources/
12. NNLM National Virtual Health Misinformation Symposium [Internet]. NNLM. [cited 2024 Nov 7]. Available from: https://www.nnlm.gov/training/class/nnlm-national-virtual-health-misinformation-symposium
13. Office of the U.S. Surgeon General. A community toolkit for addressing health misinformation [Internet]. U.S. Public Health Service; 2021 [cited 2024 Nov 7]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/health-misinformation-toolkit-english.pdf
14. Ismail N, Kbaier D, Farrell T, & Kane A. The Experience of Health Professionals With Misinformation and Its Impact on Their Job Practice: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Formative Research. 2022 6(11), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2196/38794
15. Jennings W, Stoker G, Bunting H, Valgarðsson VO, Gaskell J, Devine D, ... & Mills MC. Lack of trust, conspiracy beliefs, and social media use predict COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines. 2021 9(6), 593.
16. Gruzd A, Abul-Fottouh D, Song MY, Saiphoo A. From Facebook to YouTube: The Potential Exposure to COVID-19 Anti-Vaccine Videos on Social Media. Social Media and Society. 2023 9(1):20563051221150403.
17. Bourgault AM. Strategies to Identify and Navigate Misinformation. Critical Care Nurse. 2025 45(5), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025588
18. Choo LX, Ng IKS, Tan LF, & Teo DB. Clinical practice in an age of medical misinformation and conspiracy theories. Internal Medicine Journal, 2025 55(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16588
19. Schmid P. Debunking health misinformation with empathy. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2026 67, 102213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102213
20. Wandless D. The effect of web-based clinical misinformation on patient interactions. Statistics and Data in Healthcare. 2025 53(6), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2025.03.011
21. Wynn M. Online spaces and the control of communicable diseases: implications for nursing practice. Nursing Standard. 2024 39(5), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.2024.e12174
22. Zhou H, Zhao W, Ma R, Zheng Y, Guo Y, Wei L, Wang M. Mixed methods examination of risk perception on vaccination intentions: The perspective of doctor-patient communication. Vaccine. 2024 Jul 25;42(19):4072–80.
23. Sharman J. Recognising and addressing health misinformation in nursing practice. Primary Health Care. 2023 33(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.7748/phc.2023.e1791
24. Southwell BG, Wood JL, & Navar AM. Roles for health care professionals in addressing patient-held misinformation beyond fact correction. American Journal of Public Health. 2020 110(S3), S288–S289. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305729
25. Abbasi K, & Looi MK. How to combat misinformation in healthcare. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 2025 389, r767. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r767
26. Chiou H, Voegeli C, Wilhelm E, Kolis J, Brookmeyer K, Prybylski D. The Future of Infodemic Surveillance as Public Health Surveillance. Emerging Infectious Disease. 2022 Dec;28(13):S121–8.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Margaret Ansell, Hannah Norton, Nina Stoyan-Rosenzweig, Jane Morgan-Daniel, Mary Edwards, Lauren Adkins
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
