Health sciences librarians’ awareness and incorporation of informed consent standards for medical image publication: a preliminary study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2026.1949Keywords:
Consent, Images, Publication, Health Sciences LibrariansAbstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if health sciences library workers were aware of informed consent best practices and standards for the publication of medical images and if they incorporated the recommendations into their professional work.
Methods: A survey was developed by the authors to determine awareness and incorporation of informed consent best practices and standards for the publication of medical images. The survey was distributed via listservs of professional librarian associations in the United States. The results of the survey were tabulated in RStudio. Fisher’s Exact Test was carried out to determine if awareness of informed consent influenced job responsibilities.
Results: A total of 91 respondents were included in the data analysis with all respondents reporting multiple responsibilities (instructional, collections, and/or digital initiatives). While the majority of library workers (59%) were aware of the best practices and standards, few (6.6%) incorporated the recommendations into their professional work. Over 50% of librarians with instructional responsibilities, over 70% of librarians with collections responsibilities, and over 60% of librarians with digital initiative responsibilities were aware of the recommendations but did not incorporate the recommendations into their job duties.
Conclusions: The professional work of health sciences library workers does not appear to include a significant incorporation of informed consent best practices and standards for the publication of medical images. There is a need for future research to better understand how library workers can better incorporate their knowledge of informed consent recommendations into their work.
References
Harting MT, DeWees JM, Vela KM, Khirallah RT. Medical photography: current technology, evolving issues and legal perspectives. Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;69(4):401–9.
Ahmed S, Shipman A, Millington G, Langan EA, Ingram JR. Consent for publication: why it matters now more than ever. Br J Dermatol. 2020 Sep;183(3):409–10.
Koch CA, Larrabee WF. Patient privacy, photographs, and publication. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2013;15(5):335–6.
Kunde L, McMeniman E, Parker M. Clinical photography in dermatology: ethical and medico-legal considerations in the age of digital and smartphone technology. Australas J Dermatol. 2013 Aug;54(3):192–7.
Bhattacharya S. Clinical photography and our responsibilities. Indian J Plast Surg Off Publ Assoc Plast Surg India. 2014;47(3):277–80.
World Medical Association. WMA Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/
Lakdawala N, Fontanella D, Grant-Kels JM. Ethical considerations in dermatologic photography. Clin Dermatol. 2012;30(5):486–91.
Lau CK, Schumacher HHA, Irwin MS. Patients’ perception of medical photography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS. 2010 Jun;63(6):e507-511.
Janagond A, Inamadar A. Clinical photography in dermatology: Perception and behavior of dermatologists – A pilot study. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2021;12(4):555.
Roberts EA, Troiano C, Spiegel JH. Standardization of Guidelines for Patient Photograph Deidentification. Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;76(6):611–4.
Berle I. The principles of ethical practice in professional clinical photography. J Audiov Media Med. 2004 Mar;27(1):11–3.
Bennett KG, Bonawitz SC, Vercler CJ. Guidelines for the Ethical Publication of Facial Photographs and Review of the Literature. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J Off Publ Am Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Assoc. 2019 Jan;56(1):7–14.
Berle I. Clinical photography and patient rights: the need for orthopraxy. J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb;34(2):89–92.
Kaliyadan F, Pasquali P, Ashique KT, Jayasree P, Al Dhafiri M. Clinical Images in Dermatology Manuscripts - A Study of Journal Submission Guidelines. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2022;13(6):734–6.
Preston FG, Meng Y, Zheng Y, Hsuan J, Hamill KJ, McCormick AG. Informed Consent In Facial Photograph Publishing: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study To Determine The Effectiveness Of Deidentification Methods. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics JERHRE. 2022 Jul;17(3):373–81.
Shinkai K, Bruckner AL, Robinson JK. Best Practices for Sharing Images in Clinical Care, Research, and Education—Protecting Patient Privacy. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 May;159(7):695–7.
Creighton S, Alderson J, Brown S, Minto CL. Medical photography: ethics, consent and the intersex patient. BJU Int. 2002 Jan;89(1):67–71; discussion 71-72.
Nguyen TT, VanderWalde L, Bellavance E, Eisenhauer T, Hieken T, Johnson N, Kaufman DI, O’Neill J, Patten CR, Teller P, Tevis S, Sarantou T, Throckmorton A. Ethical Considerations of Medical Photography in the Management of Breast Disease. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2801–6.
Palacios-González C. The ethics of clinical photography and social media. Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Feb;18(1):63–70.
American Medical Association. Informed Consent. In: AMA Code of Medical Ethics [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 7]. Available from: https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/informed-consent
Roguljić M, Peričić TP, Gelemanović A, Jukić A, Šimunović D, Buljan I, Marušić M, Marušić A, Wager E. What Patients, Students and Doctors Think About Permission to Publish Patient Photographs in Academic Journals: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Croatia. Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun 1;26(3):1229–47.
Office of the Federal Register NA and RA. 45 CFR § 164.522 - Rights to request privacy protection for protected health information. [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Feb 25]. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2022-title45-vol2/CFR-2022-title45-vol2-sec164-522/
Taiwo T, Obiakor B, McClung S, Shinkai K. Informed Consent Practices for Publication of Patient Images in Dermatology Journals. JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Forthcoming.
Roguljić M, Šimunović D, Poklepović Peričić T, Viđak M, Utrobičić A, Marušić M, Marušić A. Publishing Identifiable Patient Photographs in Scientific Journals: Scoping Review of Policies and Practices. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 31;24(8):e37594.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Protection of Research Participants [Internet]. Available from: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/protection-of-research-participants.html
Committee on Publication Ethics. Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://publicationethics.org/files/Best_Practices_for_Ensuring_Consent_for_Publishing_Medical_Case_Reports_guidance_from_COPE.pdf
Roguljić M, Buljan I, Veček N, Dragun R, Marušić M, Wager E, Marušić A. Deidentification of facial photographs: a survey of editorial policies and practices. J Med Ethics. 2022 Jan;48(1):56–60.
Mavroforou A, Antoniou G, Giannoukas AD. Ethical and legal aspects on the use of images and photographs in medical teaching and publication. Int Angiol J Int Union Angiol. 2010 Aug;29(4):376–9.
Teven CM, Park JE, Song DH. Social Media and Consent: Are Patients Adequately Informed? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5):770e.
Berle I. The ethical context of clinical photography. J Audiov Media Med. 2002 Jan 1;25(3):106–9.
Kim W, Sivesind T. Patient Perceptions of Dermatologic Photography: Scoping Review. JMIR Dermatol. 2022 Jan 26;5(1):e33361.
Marshall Z, Brunger F, Welch V, Asghari S, Kaposy C. Open Availability of Patient Medical Photographs in Google Images Search Results: Cross-Sectional Study of Transgender Research. J Med Internet Res. 2018 Feb 26;20(2):e70.
Leger MC, Wu T, Haimovic A, Kaplan R, Sanchez M, Cohen D, Leger EA, Stein JA. Patient Perspectives on Medical Photography in Dermatology. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Sep;40(9):1028.
Devakumar D, Brotherton H, Halbert J, Clarke A, Prost A, Hall J. Taking ethical photos of children for medical and research purposes in low-resource settings: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jul 9;14:27.
Burns K, Belton S. “Click first, care second” photography. Med J Aust. 2012 Sep 3;197(5):265.
Burns K, Belton S. Clinicians and their cameras: policy, ethics and practice in an Australian tertiary hospital. Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun 19;37(4):437–41.
Petersilge CA. Fundamentals of Enterprise Photodocumentation: Connecting the Clinical and Technical—a Review of Key Concepts. J Digit Imaging. 2019 Dec 1;32(6):1052–61.
Kovarik CL, Sanabria B, Stoff BK. Image Consent and the Development of Image-Based Artificial Intelligence. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 May 1;158(5):589.
Taylor D, Foster E, Dunkin CSJ, Fitzgerald AM. A study of the personal use of digital photography within plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008 Jan 1;61(1):37–40.
Chan N, Charette J, Dumestre DO, Fraulin FO. Should “smart phones” be used for patient photography? Plast Surg Oakv Ont. 2016;24(1):32–4.
Bhangoo P, Maconochie IK, Batrick N, Henry E. Clinicians taking pictures—a survey of current practice in emergency departments and proposed recommendations of best practice. Emerg Med J. 2005 Nov 1;22(11):761–5.
R: The R Project for Statistical Computing [Internet]. [cited 2024 Mar 6]. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
Bresnahan M. Library Diversity and Inclusion Statements in Action. J Libr Adm. 2022 May 19;62(4):419–37.
Yepes-Rios M, Lad S, Dore S, Thapliyal M, Baffoe-Bonnie H, Isaacson JH. Diversity, equity, and inclusion: one model to move from commitment to action in medical education. SN Soc Sci. 2023 Mar 11;3(3):61.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sarah McClung, Rachel Keiko Stark, Megan DeArmond, Sherli Koshy-Chenthittayil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
