Searches as data: archiving and sharing search strategies using an institutional data repository
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1791Keywords:
Research Data Management, Data Deposit, Data Repository, Knowledge Synthesis, Expert Searching, Research Reproducibility, Systematic Review MethodologyAbstract
Background: By defining search strategies and related database exports as code/scripts and data, librarians and information professionals can expand the mandate of research data management (RDM) infrastructure to include this work. This new initiative aimed to create a space in McGill University’s institutional data repository for our librarians to deposit and share their search strategies for knowledge syntheses (KS).
Case Presentation: The authors, a health sciences librarian and an RDM specialist, created a repository collection of librarian-authored knowledge synthesis (KS) searches in McGill University’s Borealis Dataverse collection. We developed and hosted a half-day “Dataverse-a-thon” where we worked with a team of health sciences librarians to develop a standardized KS data management plan (DMP), search reporting documentation, Dataverse software training, and how-to guidance for the repository.
Conclusion: In addition to better documentation and tracking of KS searches at our institution, the KS Dataverse collection enables sharing of searches among colleagues with discoverable metadata fields for searching within deposited searches. While the initial creation of the DMP and documentation took about six hours, the subsequent deposit of search strategies into the institutional data repository requires minimal effort (e.g., 5-10 minutes on average per deposit). The Dataverse collection also empowers librarians to retain intellectual ownership over search strategies as valuable stand-alone research outputs and raise the visibility of their labor. Overall, institutional data repositories provide specific benefits in facilitating compliance both with PRISMA-S guidance and with RDM best practices.
References
Rosenthal DS, Reich VA. Archiving supplemental materials. Information Standards Quarterly. 2010;22(3):16-21.
Herold P. Data sharing among ecology, evolution, and natural resources scientists: An analysis of selected publications. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication. 2015 Sep 22;3(2). https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1244.
Federer LM, Belter CW, Joubert DJ, Livinski A, Lu YL, Snyders LN, Thompson H. Data sharing in PLOS ONE: an analysis of data availability statements. PloS one. 2018 May 2;13(5): e0194768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194768.
Murray-Rust P. Open data in science. Nature Precedings. 2008 Jan 18. https://doi.org/10.1038/npre.2008.1526.1.
Tedersoo L, Küngas R, Oras E, Köster K, Eenmaa H, Leijen Ä, Pedaste M, Raju M, Astapova A, Lukner H, Kogermann K. Data sharing practices and data availability upon request differ across scientific disciplines. Scientific data. 2021 Jul 27;8(1):192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00981-0.
Wicherts JM, Borsboom D, Kats J, Molenaar D. The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American psychologist. 2006 Oct;61(7):726. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.61.7.726.
Krawczyk M, Reuben E. (Un) available upon request: field experiment on researchers' willingness to share supplementary materials. Accountability in research. 2012 May 1;19(3):175-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2012.678688.
Rethlefsen ML, Brigham TJ, Price C, Moher D, Bouter LM, Kirkham JJ, Schroter S, Zeegers MP. Systematic review search strategies are poorly described and not reproducible: a cross-sectional meta-research study. medRxiv. 2023:2023-05. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.11.23289873.
MacMillan D. Data sharing and discovery: What librarians need to know. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2014 Sep 1;40(5):541-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2014.06.011.
Sturges P, Bamkin M, Anders JH, Hubbard B, Hussain A, Heeley M. Research data sharing: Developing a stakeholder‐driven model for journal policies. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015 Dec;66(12):2445-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23336.
Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, Bouwman J. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific data. 2016 Mar 15;3(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
National Institutes of Health. Final NIH Policy for Data Management and Sharing [Internet]. 2020 [cited 16 August 2023]. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-21-013.html.
Government of Canada. Tri-Agency research data management policy [Internet]. 2021 [cited 16 August 2023]. https://www.science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/eng/h_97610.html.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Clinical Trials [Internet]. [cited 16 August 2023]. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/publishing-and-editorial-issues/clinical-trial-registration.html.
Nguyen PY, Kanukula R, McKenzie JE, Alqaidoom Z, Brennan SE, Haddaway NR, Hamilton DG, Karunananthan S, McDonald S, Moher D, Nakagawa S. Changing patterns in reporting and sharing of review data in systematic reviews with meta-analysis of the effects of interventions: cross sectional meta-research study. bmj. 2022 Nov 22;379. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-072428.
Callaghan S, Donegan S, Pepler S, Thorley M, Cunningham N, Kirsch P, Ault L, Bell P, Bowie R, Leadbetter A, Lowry R. Making data a first class scientific output: Data citation and publication by NERC’s environmental data centres. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.218.
Sayre F, Riegelman A. Replicable services for reproducible research: a model for academic libraries. College & Research Libraries. 2019 Mar 1;80(2):260. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.2.260.
Chen X, Dallmeier-Tiessen S, Dasler R, Feger S, Fokianos P, Gonzalez JB, Hirvonsalo H, Kousidis D, Lavasa A, Mele S, Rodriguez DR. Open is not enough. Nature Physics. 2019 Feb;15(2):113-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0342-2.
Condon P, Simpson J, Emanuel M. Research data integrity: A cornerstone of rigorous and reproducible research. IASSIST Quarterly. 2022 Dec 1;46(3). https://doi.org/10.29173/iq1033.
Ross-White A. Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul 1;109(3):505-506. https://doi.org/10.5195%2Fjmla.2021.1226.
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors [Internet]. [cited 23 Jun 2023]. https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.
Desmeules R, Campbell S, Dorgan M. Acknowledging librarians’ contributions to systematic review searching. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada. 2016 Aug 7;37(2). https://doi.org/10.5596/c16-014.
Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, Koffel JB. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic reviews. 2021 Dec;10(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z.
Rethlefsen ML, Page MJ. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2022 Apr 4;110(2):253. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1449.
Boruff J, Rod AB. Searches as data: Using an institutional data repository to archive and share knowledge synthesis searches. Presented at: Canadian Health Librarian Association Conference, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada; June 11, 2022.
Open Science Framework. OSF Home [Internet]. [cited 23 June 2023]. < https://osf.io/>.
Winks R. Newly launched searchRxiv builds search community to foster easier, quicker research. CABI Digital Library [Internet]. 2021 Dec 17 [cited 23 Jun 2023]. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/do/10.5555/blog-searchrxiv-builds-search-community.
MacEachern M. Literature searches for evidence syntheses in the health sciences [data collection]. University of Michigan Deep Blue Data. [rev. 27 May 2022; cited 23 Jun 2023]. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/data/collections/nv9353295?locale=en.
King G. An introduction to the dataverse network as an infrastructure for data sharing. Sociological Methods & Research. 2007 Nov;36(2):173-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124107306660.
Borealis. Borealis user guide [Internet]. [Cited 16 August 2023]. https://learn.scholarsportal.info/all-guides/borealis/.
Ganshorn H, Premji Z. Data Management for Systematic Reviews: Guidance is Needed. Journal of eScience Librarianship. 2021 Nov 9;10(4). https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2021.1220
Ganshorn H, Premji Z. Guide to the DMP Assistant Template for Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 11 May 2023 [Cited 18 August 2023]. https://libguides.ucalgary.ca/DMPforSR.
Borealis. Borealis Technology Infrastructure and Security Information [Internet]. [Cited 16 August 2023]. https://borealisdata.ca/technology/.
Université de Montréal Dataverse. Bibliothèque du CHUM stratégies de recherche pour les synthèses des connaissances [Internet]. [Cited 16 August 2023]. https://borealisdata.ca/dataverse/bibliochum.
University of Toronto Dataverse. HSIC Knowledge Synthesis Search Strategies [Internet]. [Cited 16 April 2023]. https://borealisdata.ca/dataverse/hsicsearches.
Dalhousie University Dataverse. Dalhousie Librarian Knowledge Synthesis Search Materials Repository [Internet]. [Cited 16 August 2023]. https://borealisdata.ca/dataverse/dalhousie_librarian_ks_search_repository.
Brunskill A, Hanneke R. The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians' contributions to systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA. 2022 Oct 10;110(4):409. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1505.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alisa Rod, Jill Boruff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
