The continued problem of URL decay: an updated analysis of health care management journal citations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1456Keywords:
URL decay, URL availability, health care management, citation analysisAbstract
Objective: This study updates a 2009 study which examined uniform resource locator (URL) decay in health care management journals and seeks to determine whether continued URL availability relates to publication date, resource type, or top-level domain. The authors also provide an analysis of differences in findings between the two study periods.
Methods: The authors collected the URLs of web-based resources cited in articles published in five health care management source journals from 2016 to 2018. The URLs were checked to see if they were still active and then analyzed to determine if continued availability was related to publication date, resource type, or top-level domain.
Results: There were statistically significant differences in URL availability across publication date, resource type, and top-level domain. Domains with the highest rate of decay were .com and .net and the lowest rate were .edu and .gov. As expected, the older the citation, the higher the rate of decay. The overall rate of URL decay decreased from 49.3% to 36.1% between studies.
Conclusion: URL decay in health care management journals has decreased in the last 15 years. Still, URL decay does continue to be a problem. Interestingly, health services policy research journals had a lower rate of decay than practitioner-oriented journals (34.8% vs. 51.7%). Authors, publishers, and librarians should continue to promote the use of digital object identifiers and web archiving and perhaps study and replicate efforts used by health services policy research journals to increase continued URL availability rates.
References
Wagner C, Gebremichael MD, Taylor MK, Soltys MJ. Disappearing act: decay of uniform resource locators in health care management journals. J Med Libr Assoc. 2009 Apr;97(2):122-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.97.2.009.
Hennessey J, Ge SX. A cross disciplinary study of link decay and the effectiveness of mitigation techniques. BMC Bioinform. 2013;14(Suppl 14):1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-S14-S5.
Rumsey M. Runaway train: problems of permanence, accessibility, and stability in the use of web sources in law review citations. Law Libr J. 2002 Winter;94(1):27–39.
Russell E, Kane J. The missing link: assessing the reliability of internet citations in history journals. Technol and Cult. 2008 Apr;49(2):420–9.
Strader CR, Hamill FD. Rotten but not forgotten. Ser Libr. 2007 Sept;53(1-2):163–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v53n01_13.
Taylor MK, Hudson D. “Linkrot” and the usefulness of web site bibliographies. Ref User Serv Q. 2000 Spring;39(3):273–7.
Tyler DC, McNeil B. Librarians and link rot: a comparative analysis with some methodological considerations. Portal: Libr Acad. 2003 Oct;3(4):615–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0098.
Jalali M. Accessibility and decay of web citations in computer science journals. Libr Philos Pract. 2019:1-14.
Goh DHL, Ng PK. Link decay in leading information science journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tech. 2007 Jan;58(1):15-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20513.
Gertler AL, Bullock JG. Reference rot: an emerging threat to transparency in political science. PS: Polit Sci Polit. 2017 Jan;50(1):166-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096516002353.
Isfandyari-Moghaddam A, Saberi MK. The life and death of URLs: the case of Journal of the Medical Library Association. Libr Philos Pract. 2011 July;1-8.
Bar-Ilan J, Peritz BC. The lifespan of “informetrics” on the Web: an eight-year study (1998–2006). Scientometrics. 2009 Apr;79(1):7–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0401-7.
Oguz F, Koehler WC. Document constancy and persistence: a study of web pages in library and information science domain. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2011;48(1):1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801059.
Payne N, Thelwall M. A longitudinal study of academic webs: growth and stabilisation. Scientometrics. 2007 June;71(3):523–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1695-y.
Payne N, Thelwall M. Do academic link types change over time? J Doc. 2008 Sept;64(5):707–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810899727.
Payne N, Thelwall M. Longitudinal trends in academic web links. J Inf Sci. 2008 May;34(1):3–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0165551507079417.
Burtis AT, Howell, SM, Taylor, MT. Mapping the literature of health care management: an update. J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Jul;109(3):464-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.1121.
Internet Archive. Wayback Machine [Internet]. San Francisco, CA [2022; cited 29 June 2022]. https://archive.org/web.
Tong Z, Shema A, Acuna DE. Dead science: most resources linked in biomedical articles disappear in eight years. In: Taylor N, Christian-Lamb C, Martin M, Nardi B, editors. Information in contemporary society: iConference 2019. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2019. p.170-6. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science; vol 114201). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_16.
Watwood CL, Dean T. Mapping the literature of dental hygiene: an update. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Jul;107(3):374-83. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.562.
Watwood CL. Mapping the literature of pediatric nursing: update and implications for library services. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Oct;104(4):278-83. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.005.
Library of Congress. Web archiving collaborations [Internet]. Washington, DC [2022; cited 14 Jun 2022]. https://www.loc.gov/programs/web-archiving/about-this-program/web-archiving-collaborations/.
Schilling LM, Kelly DP, Drake AL, Heilig LF, Hester EJ, Dellavalle RP. Digital information archiving policies in high-impact medical and scientific periodicals. JAMA. 2004 Dec;292(22):2720-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.22.2724.
Health Affairs. General information & submission details for authors [Internet]. Washington, DC [2021; cited 2 Dec 2021]. https://www.healthaffairs.org/help-for-authors.
Health Services Research. For authors [Internet]. Chicago, IL [2021; cited 2 Dec 2021]. https://www.hsr.org/authors.
Healthcare Management Review. Information for authors [Internet]. Philadelphia, PA [2021; cited 2 Dec 2021]. https://journals.lww.com/hcmrjournal/pages/ informationforauthors.aspx.
Journal of Healthcare Management. Information for authors [Internet]. Philadelphia, PA [2021; cited 2 Dec 2021]. https://journals.lww.com/jhmonline/_layouts/15/ 1033/oaks.journals/informationforauthors.aspx.
Medical Care Research & Review. Manuscript submission guidelines [Internet]. Thousand Oaks, CA [2021; cited 2 Dec 2021]. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal/medical-care-research-and-review#submission-guidelines.
Foster ED, Deardorff A. Open Science Framework (OSF). J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Apr;105(2):203-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88.
Gordon-Murnane L. Linkrot + Content Drift = Reference Rot. Online Searcher. 2018 Nov;42(6):10–7.
Casserly M, Bird JE. Web citation availability: analysis and implication for scholarship. Coll Res Libr. 2003 Jul;64(4):300-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.64.4.300.
Goh DH, Ng PK. Link decay in leading information science journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2007 Jan;58(1):15-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20513.
Isfandyari-Moghaddam A, Saberi MK, Esmaeel SM. Availability and half-life of Web references cited in Information Research Journal: a citation study. Int J Inf Manage, 2010;8(2):57-75.
Niveditha B, Kumbar M, Kumar BTS. Rotten web citations cited in scholarly journals: use of time travel for retrieval. Aslib J Inf Manag. 2022;74(2):225–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-05-2021-0139.
Dimitrova DV, Bugeja M. The half-life of internet references cited in communication journals. New Media Soc. 2007 Oct;9(9):811–26. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807081226.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Amber Burtis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
