Identifying diversity, equity, and inclusion enhancement opportunities through an online mixed methods library survey

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1436

Keywords:

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Mixed Methods, Online Surveys, Health Science Libraries, Medical Libraries

Abstract

Objective: A mixed methods survey was conducted at a health sciences library to assess patrons’ perceptions of the library’s digital and physical environments in relation to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).

Methods: Developed by the library’s DEI Team and preceded by a pilot assessment, the survey posed 17 Likert Scale questions and 2 free-text response questions on the topics of belonging, inclusivity, equitability, emotional and physical safety, and commitment to DEI. The survey was created in Qualtrics, pilot tested, and launched in February 2020 for approximately 12 weeks.

Results: Objective question responses were received from 101 individuals, with 24 open-ended responses. The quantitative findings showed largely positive perceptions of the DEI climate. Questions about feeling welcome and feeling physically safe were among those with the highest responses. The three lower-scoring questions indicate areas for improvement, including services for people whose native language is not English, for individuals with disabilities, and for families. The qualitative findings indicate the library’s strengths include its exhibitions, welcoming atmosphere, and LGBTQ+ inclusivity initiatives. In contrast, opportunities for enhancement encompass non-English language resources, website updates, and accessibility to some physical spaces.

Conclusions: The DEI Team is using the online survey data to enhance HSCL’s services, staffing, programming, policies, and spaces. Employee DEI training is ongoing and the Team is currently analyzing results from a training needs survey to identify unanticipated knowledge gaps. HSCL has a long history of partnering with campus entities, which will help the DEI Team to continually move forward with their work.

Author Biography

Jane Morgan-Daniel, University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries

Community Engagement and Health Literacy Liaison Librarian, Assistant University Librarian, University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries

 

References

HappyOrNot. Smiley Terminal [Internet]. Delray Beach, FL: [cited 1 Mar 2021]. <https://www.happy-or-not.com/en/smiley-terminal/>.

Olney CA, Barnes S. Collecting and analyzing evaluation data [Internet]. 2nd ed. Bethesda, MD: National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Outreach Evaluation Resource Center; 2013 [cited 1 Mar 2021]. <https://nnlm.gov/sites/default/files/neo/files/booklet-three.pdf>.

Association of Research Libraries. ClimateQUAL [Internet]. Washington, DC: The Association [rev. 2012; cited 27 Apr 2018]. <https://www.climatequal.org/home>.

Case Western Reserve University. 2010‐2011 Climate survey: Results on common questions [Internet]. Cleveland, OH: The University; 2011 [cited 27 Apr 2021]. <https://case.edu/diversity/about/diversity-climate-survey>.

University of Michigan. University of Michigan campus climate survey on diversity, equity and inclusion [Internet]. Anne Arbor, MI: The University; 2016 [cited 27 Apr 2021]. <https://diversity.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DEI-STUDENT-REPORT-FINAL.pdf>.

Pionke J. Medical library association diversity and inclusion task force 2019 survey report. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jul;108(3):503. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5195%2Fjmla.2020.948

Ramsey E, Brown D. Feeling like a fraud: helping students negotiate their academic identities. Coll. Undergrad. Libr. 2018. 25(1):86-90. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1364080>.

Espaillat A, Panna DK, Goede DL, Gurka MJ, Novak MA, Zaidi Z. An exploratory study on microaggressions in medical school: What are they and why should we care? Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Jun;8(3):143-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0516-3.

Brunskill A. “Without that detail, I’m not coming”: The perspectives of students with disabilities on accessibility information provided on academic library websites. Coll and Res Libr. 2020 Jul;81(5):768-788. <https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/24511/32331>.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jul;3(2):77-101. <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa>.

Stewart B, Ju B, and Kendrick KD. Racial climate and inclusiveness in academic libraries: perceptions of welcomeness among Black college students. Libr Q. 2019;89(1):16-33. <https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/700661>.

Moore AC, Croxton R, Sprague L. Breaking down barriers for student parents and caregivers with family-friendly library spaces. J Libr Adm 2020;60(3):215-234. <https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2019.1685823>.

University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries. Code of Conduct [Internet]. Gainesville, FL: [cited 4 Mar 2021]. <https://library.health.ufl.edu/about-us/library-user-policies/code-of-conduct/>.

Norris M. The Race Card Project [Internet]. Washington, DC: [cited 1 Mar 2021]. <https://theracecardproject.com/>.

Published

2023-03-24

Issue

Section

Original Investigation