Letter to the Editor


Response to “Phrase truncation in PubMed searches”


Steven Duffy, PgDip, Shelley de Kock, BLIS, Kate Misso, MSc, Caro Noake, MA, Janine Ross, MSc, Lisa Stirk, MScEcon

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.261

Received May 2017: Accepted June 2017

To the editor, Shanman’s letter to the editor is absolutely correct to point out that phrases can be truncated when searching in PubMed. In our article, we wanted to depict, with a simplified search strategy, how it is not straightforward to translate a strategy from MEDLINE Ovid into PubMed syntax. It is important to note that the main focus of our article was not performance of truncation in PubMed; rather, we investigated whether supplementary searches of PubMed improved the currency of MEDLINE Ovid.

The actual MEDLINE Ovid search strategy used in practice had more synonyms and was designed to capture the terms “prostatic” as well as “prostate”:

This was translated to run in PubMed as:

With hindsight, we should have included prostat* in our concise example and described in detail how truncating more than one word in a phrase can have unexpected results in PubMed: neither prostat* cancer*[tiab] or “prostat* cancer*”[tiab] produce the expected results. Traditionally, we have used this method because of past experiences with unexpected results and issues with PubMed timing out. We have been overcautious with our use of quotation marks, as well as field tags, in order to disable PubMed’s Automatic Term Mapping so as to have more control over how our searches are performed.

Taking on board the approach that Shanman suggested, a modified version of our search strategy might look like the following:

Thank you for clarifying how phrase searching truncation is performed in PubMed. We will consider using this approach when designing search strategies for PubMed in the future.

Since our investigations were completed, Ovid has introduced the “Epub Ahead of Print” segment to their MEDLINE suite. This raises the question of whether it is still necessary to conduct supplementary searches in PubMed to identify ahead-of-print articles, which would be worth investigating further.


(Return to Top)


Steven Duffy, PgDip, steven@systematic-reviews.com, Information Specialist, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, United Kingdom

Shelley de Kock, BLIS, Information Specialist, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, United Kingdom

Kate Misso, MSc, Information Specialist Manager, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, United Kingdom

Caro Noake, MA, Information Specialist, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, United Kingdom

Janine Ross, MSc, Information Specialist, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, United Kingdom

Lisa Stirk, MScEcon, Information Specialist, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews, Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, York, YO19 6FD, United Kingdom


Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.


Journal of the Medical Library Association, VOLUME 105, NUMBER 4, October 2017